• UnicodeHamSic [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    722 years ago

    There was a moment in my life where I was optimistic about masks. I pictured a cyberpunk future we didn’t get sick as much and had a cool new fashion accessory we could have fun with. It is wild how capitlaism couldn’t even resist the power of covid

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    132 years ago

    Why are we still talking about Covid? Shouldn’t we all have a good deal of immunity against it?

    • silent_water [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      332 years ago

      covid exposure exacerbates my disability. my immune system freaks out and gives me months of debilitating migraines - it’s had me more or less stuck in bed for 6 months at this point. another exposure would cost me my wfh job. and that’s without infection - just exposure. pretending covid is over throws people like me under the bus.

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      It isn’t as bad as 2020, but it isn’t as harmless as the flu. There are still going to be public health concerns.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        With so much vaccination, how does people don’t have immunity yet?

        Even if they were not vaccinated for a while, there’s always a percentage of immunity. The virus itself is not that deadly as well.

        • tripartitegraph [comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          382 years ago

          I know a 25 year old who had a stroke last month because of covid complications. Sure, not deadly but… I don’t want to have a stroke either

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Because immunity varies by disease.

          Chicken pox? Pretty much one and done. COVID? Falls off rapidly after 3 months, whether you catch it or get the vaccine

          Plus, every mutation is a dice roll on how much existing immunity will apply. It could be exactly the same as the last strain, or the old immunity might not help at all

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            I did, hence i said:

            Even if they were not vaccinated for a while, there’s always a percentage of immunity.

            Sorry, but I’m not up to the fearmongering campaigns once again. The first response to Covid was totally out of measure in my opinion and they’re retrying it again.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              82 years ago

              We all knew you had already drawn your conclusion that this was “fearmongering” before seeing any facts.

              No one is going to logic you out of a position you didn’t use logic to get into in the first place.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              582 years ago

              The first response to Covid was totally out of measure in my opinion

              what-the-hell

              Inconveniencing boomers consuming their sit-in restaurant treats until they started blockading hospitals and breaking into government buildings until those inconveniences were rolled back was “out of measure?”

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 years ago

                I haven’t been around Lemmy for a few weeks and today is my first time seeing anyone from the Hexbear instance. I like you people.

            • Iraglassceiling [she/her]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              472 years ago

              Death is not the only negative outcome from Covid infection. When you consider the literature on Covid causing grey matter loss, prion disease, chronic vasculitis, cardiac disease, autoimmune disease, etc, you could argue death is actually one of the preferred outcomes.

              Immunity isn’t an on/off switch and the virus is mutating to escape immune detection. It seems like you do not have a solid grasp on the kinetics of vaccine and viral immunity, is there a question I can answer for you or would you like some resources that might help improve your comprehension?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              27
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Bruh.

              The curse of successful mitigation is skeptics will then say afterwards that ‘X was no big deal, look how few people died’

              Don’t be one of those.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                22 years ago

                I blame the combination of how over-hyped the (real) issue of Y2K was combined with how successfully we handled it (partly because everyone was so worked up about it) leading to the (common issue for IT professionals) take away of “well nothing went wrong, why did we put all that effort into trying to stop something going wrong?” for no small part of why people weren’t as willing to try to stop/minimise Covid as they otherwise might have been (of course it was always going to be a harder sell as Y2K mostly required from the general public that they don’t have a tantrum about organisations paying professionals to fix the problem directly whereas Covid required the general public to follow the advice of the professionals in taking action in their own lives.)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          That’s not how any of the COVID vaccines were reported to work. No such thing as total immunity.
          The virus is deadly depending on what conditions are met (underlying risk factors, etc.). Not all of those conditions are obvious or well-studied, so it always seemed to me like a lottery who gets killed by the virus.
          Furthermore, I don’t believe the article is fearmongering. As I said in a separate comment, it’s more like “hey, there might be a bit of an outbreak in some places this flu season, so keep some N95s on hand just in case numbers go up.” I HIGHLY doubt we would see another shutdown.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            To answer your question, while you didn’t say it outright, your response makes a likely inference to be that you believe COVID reporting was overblown to generate revenue.

            That is the far-right taking point they are most likely referring to.

            The number of hospitalizations and deaths is a statistic that was tracked and the far-right lead a campaign to discredit those statistics. Later, the far-right lead a campaign to say that vaccination should have resulted in full immunity, which it was never reported to do, in an effort to discredit scientists and make their followers feel validated in their decision to not vaccinate.

            • Blake [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              I don’t believe that reporting about the pandemic was overblown at the time that the pandemic was a public health crisis, actually I believe it was underreported, quite significantly.

              However, I believe that the combination of the huge uncertainty, people desperately trying to keep up to date, people being off work or working from home, the huge amount of conversation around COVID news stories, etc. that the news websites got an unprecedented amount of traffic, clicks and revenue, and since that has tapered off, they’re basically like an addict desperate for a fix. They’ll present any minor COVID news, no matter how inconsequential, as a far bigger issue than it really is.

              I don’t really believe that COVID will make a resurgence, but if it does, I’ll be there encouraging people to wear a mask. But I’m not gonna freak out and declare a state of emergency because a researcher tweeted some toilet thought.

          • ToxicDivinity [comrade/them]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 years ago

            I think because you seem to be agreeing with the poster who is against masking? But I’m not sure because his post is removed now.

            When you said

            Because it generates clicks (and thus revenue) for media conglomerates.

            What generates clicks?

            I’m just asking because the post you were responding to got removed so I’m missing context

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            The pushback against the perfectly sensible responses to the pandemic was orchestrated by far-right political entities as a way to rally their supporters against “the oppressive left-wing/liberal agenda to control and exploit you!”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 years ago

    I saw a study a while back that claimed that good filtration and ventilation systems in indoor public places were more effective than masking. If that’s the case, what I’d like to see is subsidies for businesses and public buildings to get.new systems installed, as well as new minimum air quality standards for public spaces with inspections for enforcement.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    662 years ago

    This post made me realize how completely ignorant to covid I’ve become lately… I had to check the date to see if it was current or years old.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I hate scepticism over vaccines, but when it has just been announced that vaccines can be sold to the public for around £100 each, and then this comes along. They say ignore how many are being admitted to hospital as other consequences are more dangerous.

    I have followed the hospital rates as a metric for over a year now. I don’t see any other metric as valid. The death rate is reduced as the most vulnerable have been seen off. The reporting rate is non-existent because people are not interested anymore. People are under pressure to attend work with covid now, so why would they bother with the testing kits. Patients in hospital is the most sensible data point to me.

    Why are we not being told of which areas are showing the most cases? Covid cases are drastically reduced now. Which hospitals are taking in large amounts of cases?

    It would be stupid to take unnecessary risks, but this has a bad smell of fear mongering to sell vaccines around it for me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    95
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Wear a Mask. Get vaccinated. Stop spreading misinformation

    Since the anti-mask/vax comments seem to be flooding in, figured I’d make my opinion known too… as obnoxiously as I can, because apparently that’s how it’s done