🖕 Fuck PayPal

And fuck Linus Tech Tips for intentionally keeping quiet about this after they found out.

  • @gencha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17 months ago

    The product is spyware by design. It’s a honey pot for people trying to save a few bucks, while exposing their entire browsing behavior. They even called it honey…

  • @M1nds3nd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    627 months ago

    Ever since it was explained that Mr. Beast only smiles with his mouth, I get skeeved out every time I see him.

  • @azalty@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    367 months ago

    Just open their privacy policy and done. They sell your browsing info, and you could stop it there

    • @buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      117 months ago

      This isn’t even remotely true. There are lots of advertisers and sponsors that aren’t scams. But unfortunately our consumer protection laws haven’t quite caught up to the digital marketplace. So there is a lot of room on the internet in general for scammy behavior.

      As always, it’s buyer beware. As well as a big amount of content creator beware as well.

    • @frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I don’t mind things that are an actual thing to buy. I want to research it first–you can get a better electric razor than Manscaped for not much more–but at least it’s clear how they make their money. Honey was obviously getting money from someone other than their users, and that’s an immediate red flag.

      • @buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        167 months ago

        I and many other people naturally assumed that honey was getting their money from consumer data collection. Which is why I didn’t use the service myself. The surprise is the fact that the scam isn’t just consumer data collection but actually stealing commissions from content creators as well as using consumers as a gateway to stealing money from businesses that they have contracts with.

      • @riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 months ago

        Yeah. PayPal bought a coupon browser extension for how much? If the only thing they do is save YOU money, how come they can afford a sponsored segment in a mr beast video?

  • @jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    917 months ago

    If you’re sitting at a poker table and you can’t tell who the sucker is, it’s you.

    Alternately, if you look at an online service and can’t tell what the product is, It’s you.

      • Fubarberry
        link
        fedilink
        English
        257 months ago

        Yeah, I feel like that’s usually a very accurate saying, but it doesn’t really work with a lot of open source projects.

        I hate that you’re getting downvoted by so many people who don’t realize you’re pointing out an exception to the rule, and instead think you have some fundamental misunderstanding about how Linux works.

        • @tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          It’s difficult for others to take advantage of you when you can learn what the software actually does and have it modified to work another way.

          Linux (for the most part) is open source but I’d argue the inclusion of any proprietary software/firmware/drivers means something ultimately isn’t.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          They are getting downvoted for misconstruing something that is clearly a rule about profit making services and applying it to crowd sourced non-profit open source projects.

          Truly open source projects don’t have suckers.

          • Fubarberry
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            misconstruing something that is clearly a rule about profit making services

            To be honest I don’t think that’s clear at all, it feels like it’s more a rule about being skeptical of free stuff online. And many for profit companies have open source projects that can be used safely even though the source is a for-profit.

        • @otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          57 months ago

          I think the issue was with the original commenter’s phrasing. Facebook looks like a product. But the commenter meant “How the product is being funded”.

          Of course, it gets hard when there’s multiple sources of revenue. You used to be able to spot ads and come to the conclusion that that was everything. Now an ad is just the tip of the iceberg.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        97 months ago

        Except Linux has proper legal underpinnings that anyone with a few brain cells can verify.

        You can compile your own code too

        Hence why people always say do your diligence

      • @fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 months ago

        I mean, yes?

        The key difference is linux wants you to help make it better. Something like Honey steals your data, and steals money from others, and then wants you to make it better.

    • @CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      157 months ago

      And even if you can tell what the product is, it‘s still often you. “Premium” subscriptions for example might hide (some) ads, but services still collect as much data about you. Even grocery stores where the offer seems obvious are trying to bait you into installing their apps to collect data on top of charging you for every item. And sure it’s not relevant in this case, but it’s something we should never forget.

  • Electric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    367 months ago

    Pretty sure this was already posted yesterday when it came out. Or it might have been a different community.

    Watching the full video is important though because they are scamming the consumer too, not just “”“influencers”“”. Someone made a great comment about how it’s just one greedy troll stealing from another and has no effect on the consumer since they still save money but Honey not actually giving you the best coupons on purpose is next level dickholery.

    Lying about the coupons really should be the focus so people stop harming themselves using Honey.

    • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      I never use affiliate links AND I don’t bother looking for coupons (let’s be honest, who does?) so I don’t give a crap, every now and then I’m saving money without taking it from anyone 🤷

      • @Cataphract@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        idk, I find the coupon thing to be super easy. Just takes one search and maybe two clicks if you have ad blockers on. Mostly the only time is if I’m ordering something like pizza for a get together where no special applies. There’s a local chain in my state that had a coupon code for half off my order that wasn’t listed on their site (they might’ve given it to me if I called but who knows). Been using that for the past year and it allows me to convince everyone to go there instead of a national chain. I’ve also been lucky with some manufacturers coupons for products I’m ordering straight from them, it’s more rare though so it’s hit or miss sometimes.

      • @CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        I just look up price trends and that’s pretty much it for me too. Coupons rarely ever worked for me in the early days of e-commerce so I quickly stopped bothering.

    • @kalleboo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      It’s also kind of a protection racket against shops. “Partner with us or we’ll cut into your profits by spreading cheap coupon codes, but partner with us and we’ll protect you”

    • @dirthawker0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 months ago

      I used Honey before thr PayPal purchase and it did have working discount codes, as well as a cashback thing that I redeemed a couple times. But I haven’t had any codes work for a long time.

      I don’t have any love for influencers but they have the right to make money IMO, and it’s completely shitty behavior for honey to be taking that away from them.

    • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      177 months ago

      See, I’m torn. I’ve never used honey, so I was never scammed. However I do think them scamming consumers is awful.

      Buuuuuuuut, I DO enjoy the fact that they scammed influencers.

      • Electric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        127 months ago

        Yeah I thought that too until seeing the bits about consumers getting shafted. Awful company, hope they get sued into bankruptcy.

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        Small content creator makes informative, honest review of a product. Honey gets money on the commission. This makes you happy?

    • @frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      527 months ago

      They didn’t hide it, but a huge portion of their audience doesn’t read the forums. A 10 minute video of Linus ranting about them would have opened this scandal to a wider audience years ago.

      • @buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        97 months ago

        There may have been non-disclosure agreements between Linus tech tips and PayPal Honey. They may have threatened to sue him if he went public. I’m assuming we’ll find out the details in the next few weeks.

      • @Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        157 months ago

        Linus usually likes to rant about it on the WAN show then they usually make a clip for YouTube, but weird he didn’t do that for honey, maybe he didn’t know how far the scam went.

        • @whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Especially considering he hasn’t been shy about ranting about a lot of things from (insert latest apple thing) to “fucking eggshell”

          • @tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            non disparagement clause

            Not the level of a non-compete clause but that’s a scummy thing I hope is not legal.

            • @JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 months ago

              It’s fairly common. As far as legal, that will depend on the jurisdiction and the mood of the judge.

        • zqps
          link
          fedilink
          English
          217 months ago

          As creator that makes some of their profits from affiliate links, I don’t see how that could be the case for him.

          Seems more likely they had a reason to avoid beef with PayPal.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      267 months ago

      Yeah, that not nothing but it isn’t far off. They have a massive platform. It deserved at least a video telling people about it.

    • @CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      137 months ago

      If only they had some medium to post the information, perhaps a medium that that VAST MAJORITY of their viewers use.

      “But the plans were on display…”

      “On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.”

      “That’s the display department.”

      “With a flashlight.”

      “Ah, well, the lights had probably gone.”

      “So had the stairs.”

      “But look, you found the notice, didn’t you?”

      “Yes,” said Arthur, “yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.”

      • @JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Their complaint was that honey inserted their affiliate cookie even when they didn’t find a coupon code for you. I doubt they knew the full extent of the scam.

        Plus, we don’t know what was in their contract with honey. They could still be subject to a non-disparagement clause.

        • @CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          GN doesn’t seem to have a problem holding their sponsors accountable, putting a story together, doing their due diligence, and then letting everybody know.

    • @poke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      277 months ago

      Some very vocal people on Lemmy just love hating on LTT. I don’t think this topic was worth them making a main channel video on, I think their forum post was good and I believe they even mentioned this functionality of Honey a few times on the WAN show. It wasn’t a secret, and anyone who cared to do in-depth research on a potential sponsor could have found out.

      • @tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        [Added information: LTT say they were unaware Honey was mistreating users. So they had no reason to make a video at the time they dropped Honey for mistreating them.]

        I don’t think this topic was worth them making a main channel video on

        Their viewers getting scammed by tech they promoted isn’t worth a video on their main channel? If they could legally do it I think they should have.

        Some very vocal people on Lemmy just love hating on LTT

        LTT have made mistakes (edit: and made choices/comments I would disprove of) but the dunking here does seem disproportionate.

        • @whats_all_this_then@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I’m definitely noticing a lot of hate warranted or not bjt it’s honestly also been hard to defend them after their last “scandal”. Once bitten twice shy…

          Same reason I don’t try to give CD Projekt RED the benefit of the doubt anymore even though I loved Cyberpunk despite the messed up launch, and it seems they’ve largely redeemed themselves - I now realize where their priorities lie.

      • dantheclamman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        They could have been exposed to legal liability to report on a business partner like that.

      • @sardaukar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 months ago

        And yet here’s the scandal being exposed TWO YEARS LATER. Yeah, LTT couldn’t possibly have handled this better… /s

        • @poke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          77 months ago

          They told everyone and nobody cared, turns out people care if a YouTube video is made framing the same thing differently. Like yeah, Honey’s practice is bad for the creator industry, but is it bad enough to bring it back to the people who took their money? No, I don’t think so.I think this is more of an example of how easy it is to get the masses angry with a YouTube video than anything. It’s good that more people are going to move away from this information harvesting app, but I really feel like the reaction and hatred is overblown and, at least for the hatred towards creators, unwarranted.

          The way I see it, people still take money from predatory gambling sites, and if any creator deserves pushback, it’s them.

    • @tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      That doesn’t include users being a victim? Honey gives users worse coupons when better ones are available, apparently that happens if companies do a deal with Honey.

    • @tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Deleted my ebay account but very rarely will buy on the site. I’ve yet to find a UK alternative.

    • @Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      I dunno, I stopped a while back, it wasn’t hard really. I’ve also heard that while they are usually fine with regular sums of money they are not to be trusted with large sums. Just word of mouth an I’ve got no proof but it put me off.

      • @BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        There are some examples of buyers exploiting the returns policy for expensive items. The buyer initiates a return of item but never sends it, gets item and refund.

  • @TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2097 months ago

    I never trusted Honey to begin with but this goes far deeper than I ever expected. I always wondered “yeah, but where do they get their money?” I always figured it was just a way to take people’s data and sell it to data brokers (which they probably also do, let’s be honest) but this is just blatant fraud. Stealing affiliate money from links and having companies pay them to purposefully give out worse coupon codes is just devious through and through. It’s basically free money and everybody else, whether influencer or consumer, get fucked over in the process.

    • Altima NEO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      867 months ago

      Yeah I always wondered what the catch was? The CEO was always posting on Reddit trying to defend honey and how cool they were.

      Either way, I never trust any shopping deal plugins. The whole idea of them is sketchy.

      • Electric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        267 months ago

        Only shopping plugin I use is the one that comes with Edge. Surprisingly good to track price history and find other sites selling the product. I considered some Chrome plugin that displays an Amazon product’s country of origin to avoid Chinesium but apparently it didn’t work well or something like that from reading the reviews. Had some attached rewards function for shopping with it, ick.

        • @ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          127 months ago

          It’s funny how Edge got lambasted for it when they introduced that feature, but it’s legitimately super helpful and non-invasive.

          • Electric
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 months ago

            I had no idea it was, I don’t keep up with browser news. I just wish they didn’t migrate to Chromium. It became my main browser for a brief period before that.

            I just used it randomly when I was working and doing some shopping for a computer in my downtime and decided to try out the feature. That and the AI are super good when combo’ed to shop smart. Managed to save $800 off a quality laptop.

        • @NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          127 months ago

          There’s a good one for Amazon called Keepa that shows you the price history of the item. Helps a ton keeping prices in check during sales like Prime Day to see how much you are actually saving, if anything.

          Also nice to see how much you could potentially save if you just wait for the next sale or if there was already a price decrease. Often times it looks like I’m good buying without waiting for any sale as the sales only knocked off a few dollars, at most.

          • Electric
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 months ago

            Thank you for the recommendation, looks neat. Tracking prices of different conditions is a nice touch. I’ll have to scrutinize it further when I make my next online purchases and chuck it into Edge as I made that my dedicated shopping browser.

    • Electric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      317 months ago

      I always assumed it was a combination of your guess and companies giving Honey special coupon codes so consumers are more eager to spend.

      “Hey Honey, we’ll give you 1% commission if you just host this HONEY5 coupon for 5% off.”

      That was my impression when I used it once. Wasn’t worth having an extension just for a slight discount. Love when a company doesn’t fulfill the service they advertise.

      • @dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        147 months ago

        But that would be an ethical business model, we can’t have that, this is PayPal and this is the internet. There’s no place for ethics in that combination.

    • @w3dd1e@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 months ago

      Same. I never downloaded it or anything like it but I didn’t realize they were playing both sides. It’s fucked.

    • @SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      87 months ago

      everybody else, whether influencer or consumer, get fucked over in the process.

      Enshittification correctly defined.

  • @pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    207 months ago

    Honestly I thought all of this was common knowledge at this point, back when I used Honey (many years ago) I saw its affiliate code in the address bar and thought “huh, that’s how they make money”

    • @Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      I remember researching it a while ago when I was curious how they made money. If anything else, this just illustrated glee little research and care people have with their online information.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      OP isn’t exactly giving you the full story there. I know for a fact I’ve seen a video on this. I remember thinking at the time “well duh”.

    • @theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Same person that said ad blocking was the same as piracy.

      edit: People downvoting me like I disagreed with him. Just saying how he looks at it. I think it’s a bit of a false dichotomy but they are definitely similar.

      • @ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It…is? You’re copying digital content without paying for it. I use uBlock but I don’t pretend to have the moral high ground.

      • @Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        77 months ago

        It is. Taking from a service without paying for it, and actively avoiding the service making money via advertising is basically the same as watching a film without paying for it.

        Both ways, you consumed a service and the people providing it got nothing, but it cost them something to create and provide it.

      • @themakara@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        237 months ago

        Have you ever heard his full stance on the matter? Because he clearly stated that this is not a judgment against using it. Heck, he’s been open about having sailed the high seas himself and still doing so for media he physically owns.

        It’s just that gaining access to media while circumventing the payment (ads in this case) is basically piracy. Which is fair.

        Signed, A uBlock User

        • @HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          How much you want to bet he uses Ad block himself but it’s suddenly different when YOU do it on HIS content?

        • @tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          If I hacked a server to get content then I would be circumventing payment at it shouldn’t be up to me how it responds to requests, I don’t own it. Google trying to enforce playing adverts via software running on my property is an unjust overreach. The user choosing what displays on their own monitor is not “circumvention”, it’s claiming ownership over your computing. Google could choose to verify on their servers if I’ve paid (in normal currency) but instead their servers act like adverts are an optional donation.

          Photo of a cat and a captain uniform, with a caption. The cat's head is poking out of the uniform. The caption reads "look at me, I am the captain now".

        • @tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          I trust Linus is being sincere when he says “it’s not a judgement” but blocking ads is being compared to a criminal doing copyright infringement (illegal). The word used is one originally meaning for a person murdering others on boats (immoral), and it’s used because it’s pejorative. It’s unavoidably judgemental.

      • @tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        They are similar only if you presume there is an agreement of content in exchange for revenue from adverts. If you view the internet as a place for open collaboration, or oppose (internet) advertisement, then you wouldn’t presume that agreement and it looks very different.

    • @galanthus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      177 months ago

      It was a matter of time until the public found out about this. They couldn’t think in the long term, by not accepting a bit of backlash, exposing the scam they unknowingly participated in they only opened themselves up for more later.

      They are not only evil, they are stupid too, which is worse.

  • @penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    297 months ago

    At this point, anything these goons “influencers” try to sell me on is a scam, and I’ll avoid it at all costs. People do insane things for money. Just watched a coffeezilla video on the CSGO gambling scam and holy shit, people are straight up heartless and have no humanity in them.