• axont [she/her, comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The worst accusation you could make about China’s alleged warcrimes are how neutral they are in regards to Israel. They also sell guns to both sides of the Kashmir conflict, which isn’t great. They have sold guns to Israel in the past as commerce, but that’s a far cry from the west simply giving Israel weapons and intelligence for free.

    Whereas the USA invades a new country on average every 1.5 years and has over 800 overseas military bases. China hasn’t had an active overseas military conflict since the Vietnam war. This isn’t a comparison at all.

    • Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Hasn’t China also sold drones to Indonesia for use in West Papua? I think that might’ve stopped, though, but I’m not sure.

    • sunzu2
      link
      fedilink
      93 months ago

      I think calling situation in Xinjiang as a war crime was sloppy…

      Should said genocide and the meme stands

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        123 months ago

        I didn’t know there were people still seriously trying to sell the “Uyghur genocide” propaganda nonsense. Mainstream media gave up on it years ago, and Israel showing what genocide actually looks like mostly put the last nail in the casket for all but the most committed sinophobes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          63 months ago

          Israel are showing us what genocide actually looks like

          There’s levels of genocide - Uyghur is definitely one, Israel on Palestine is one, so was US on First Nations, then you’ve got the ones previously in the Balkans, Rwanda and the Caucasus which make all of those look like child’s play

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            103 months ago

            If it is definitely one, you might be able to post incontrovertible evidence of it, and not just an ASPI report linking to Adrian Zenz or a satellite photo of a building they pinky swear is a death camp?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              incontrovertible

              The issue is, genocide deniers are very keen to dispute any readily available facts - Holocaust, Armenian Genocide, Holodomor, etc deniers, along with flat earthers and other far-fetched conspiracy believers are willing to reject swathes of evidence and released documents that show intent and execution; I could link you interviews with Uyghurs saying they were forceably steralised or reeducated from respected sources (and am happy to) but it seems like you’ve already made your mind up so will just be selectively blind when reading them

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                10
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                A simple “no” would have sufficed.

                Gaza, one of the poorest, most heavily policed and militarily surveiled regions in the world, managed to have incontrovertible truth of genocidal intent from day one. Years of slander from the MIC (profiting off that same genocide) about Xinjiang, a place anyone can go visit right now, which has had multiple outside probes, not a single piece of evidence.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  33 months ago

                  Thanks for proving my point that you reject even being offered evidence because you don’t want to see something that challenges your worldview.

                  I could’ve spent time compiling a list, but you’d either ignore it or say it’s a biased source because it’s non-chinese or something.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      One of the most frustrating things that I see so commonly, is that when there is criticism of the Chinese government, it is almost always redirected into whataboutism about the US.

      I’m not from the US or China. My views are that both these governments are terrible, though I admittedly am not very informed about China. But these kinds of non-responses do not help.

      Edit: I do realise that this meme itself sort of sets up the comparison, but I just wish we could analyse the actions of each government independently, without making excuses for one by pointing fingers at the other.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I’m sorry, is it discouraged to be self aware? It is very common to have preconceived ideas about things based on media/whatever, however I am trying to be self aware enough to realise that this view isn’t based on very much research, which is why I’m trying to re-evaluate it.

          Surely it is far more arrogant to assume I have no ill-informed views, and that I have never been affected by misinformation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You’re arguing with tankies. You are attacking China in their eyes. You are fighting a losing battle because you cannot convince them China has major faults and blemishes and systemic issues like the US.

            • Cowbee [he/they]
              link
              fedilink
              43 months ago

              I don’t think that’s a useful framing. The central thesis of most “tankies” is that the version of the PRC that exists in the minds of Westerners and the version that exists in reality are fundamentally different, and that this is largely due to a concerted effort by western countries to depict China in a negative light exclusively. That does not mean that there aren’t serious problems with the PRC, or that it doesn’t have a long way to go, but admitting to having a negative stance without doing much investigation means that they should investigate, rather than contribute to a miasma of other ill-informed takes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        43 months ago

        My views are that both these governments are terrible, though I admittedly am not very informed about China

        Rofl. Lmao even

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      113 months ago

      Idk why there’s such a pissing match in this post. Like honestly. Both our governments are shit. Why is this even a debate as to whose government is committing war crimes more? Your comment is the best comment here by far.

      • Dessalines
        link
        fedilink
        133 months ago

        If a serial murderer told you that their victims were actually much worse than they are, would you believe them?

        Yet the source of pretty much all anti-china atrocity propaganda is the US and its orgs like the victims of communism foundation. They want you to believe every single country they hate, China, Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, etc… are guilty of the same crimes they are. Why do you believe them?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      Ultimately we have more in common with a normal Chinese person just trying to live their lives than any of us do with our ruling classes. I’m sure those same ruling classes would rather us be less aware of that fact.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      353 months ago
      1. Dragging anchor in the baltic and cutting cables.
      2. Ramming Philippine ships and assaulting sailors.
      3. Genocide of the Uyghers.
      4. Tibet genocide.
      5. The rampant illegal fishing in every other countries coastline.
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        123 months ago

        Here’s 5 actual war crimes

        1. My Lai massacre Vietnam - America
        2. Iraq invasion (there’s thousands within this one including Abu ghraib) -america/nato 3- dressing up as medical personnel and massacring a refugee camp to save 1 person in gaza- Israel and America 4- a host of lesser known but many technical war crimes in Afghanistan like bombing undefended villages and towns https://www.culawreview.org/journal/double-standards-in-international-law-did-the-us-get-away-with-war-crimes-in-afghanistan 5- raping children and murdering their family. This is American tactic in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria with many documented cases
        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          73 months ago

          What do you chuds not understand about “two countries are committing war crimes”? You asked about China and got an answer about China. You’re trying to convince us who’s the second worst empire.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            93 months ago

            I think you’re missing the WAR part of the WAR CRIME. I thought you’d realise by now, but you’re really digging yourself a hole. Funny thing is there are wars you could have mentioned and war crimes. The point of original comment was to draw our those without any knowledge like you 😜

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          yes we are now doing exactly what the meme at the top of the page is doing.

          fyi: two spaces at the end of a line will format that correctly as a newline

           

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        133 months ago

        #4 is like claiming the Union committed genocide against enslaved people in the Confederacy by abolishing slavery

      • Dessalines
        link
        fedilink
        83 months ago

        Please list sources for any of these. Preferably not from US or british state media.

          • Red Army Dog Cooper
            link
            fedilink
            43 months ago

            I mean how about this, you CAN use those sources, however I will not treat them as a sacred cow and given there track record when dealing with places the US does not like it will take me almost no time to debunk the claim, or point out how the source is not credible on this topic, then you will wace your hands and scream about some liberal media reliability rateing that cannot even get left right and center correct, even in the US overton window, an then I will have to debunk the new media reliability AND remind you of the previous debunk.

            OR we can skip some of the easier ones to debunk and try to have an easier time in trying to understand reality, rather than just screaming and letting rich ghools make it up for us. The choice is yours

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            43 months ago

            If your sources quote “anonymous sources” and nebulous “state documents” without providing access to them, those are shit sources. I wouldn’t trust them even if I didn’t know their track record of making shit up as long as their CIA handler contact “confirms” the story.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        1 isn’t a war crimes lmao 2 isn’t a war crime 3. Isn’t a war crime nor is there proof. Literal unbacked western propaganda, wanna know what is backed? Gaza, By the west and Sudan genocide by America via UAE RIGHT NOW, you can literally watch it unfold on all social media 4. Perhaps, I would need to do more research on this one, but didn’t you got 3 wrong, I wouldn’t be surprised if your wrong again. 5. Not a war crime

        Edit: no idea how to do formatting on the phone, I apologise

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          163 months ago

          Crimes against humanity are war crimes. Looting is a war crime. Invasion of a sovereign nation is an act of war. Stealing their resources is looting. Genocide is a crime against humanity and Tibet and the Uyghers are in one.

          Wolf warriors that bury their head in the sand will suffocate under the lies.

          China has been real bad.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            93 months ago

            Uyghers are in one

            There is no post-2021 evidence whatsoever of human right abuses of any sort in the Xinjiang province against Uyghur people. You can try to find stuff but you won’t find anything, I dare you to send me a single article that has an actual reference to actual evidence of post-2021 human right abuses. Send me an article and point to the actual reference within the article. I dare you.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              63 months ago

              lmfao “post-2021” moving the goalposts as if that matters or changes anything. and this other user claiming it can’t be a war crime because there’s no war. literally L. M. F. A. O.

              i’m an american, i’m a little dull to the ol “it isn’t technically a war bc we didn’t declare war >:2” shit

              fuck america, fuck china, fuck authority.

              you and this other guy are tankie trash, full stop.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                63 months ago

                you and this other guy are tankie trash, full stop. So does then make you fascist trash? This isn’t the cold war and I was born in Scotland not Yugoslavia No buddy were just a bit brighter then you. There’s 3 tiers of thinking. 'one side is wholly bad" Tier 2 “both sides are bad” Tier 3" both sides are bad but I want to look deeper into the complexites and nuances which made me realise, one side is infinitely worse" You’re stuck on tier 2. i’m an american, i’m a little dull to the ol “it isn’t technically a war bc we didn’t declare war >:2” shit

                You said it yourself you are pretty dull as you don’t know what a freaking war crime Vs a crime against humanity is. A crime against humanity would be like slaving your citizens… Like how it’s codified in American prison laws

                • Comrade Spood
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  13 months ago

                  “Anyone who isn’t a ML is a fascist” is effectivepy what you said. Classic tankie red-fash bullshit. You bastards can only think in black or white, no nuance, no grey area, so rooted in the belief that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. You’re so blinded by your hatred of American and western fascism you are blind to the rest of the world’s descent into fascism. We live in a world ruled by fascism and imperialism, conflicts are just two fascist powers duking it out. China is just fascism with red aesthetics and America is just fascism with blue aesthetics.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              23 months ago

              Uyghur Genocide and Concentrated Reeducation Camps in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China https://search.app/fyMhR137LTgqVkEJ8

              Here is a report from the office of national intelligence last November listing all the data for the genocide.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                7
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                The document is from a US intelligence agency from what it seems, it’s poorly referenced, and even then there’s nothing post-2021, is there?

                I explicitly asked to please point at the reference within the article, because I’m exhausted of people just finding articles on google on this topic on western media and sending them to me without reading them. Please tell me what post-2021 huma right abuses are referenced and well-sourced in the report

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 months ago

                  You didn’t download it did you? There is recent and relevant information about Uygher displacement and ethic cleansing. Why do you support ethnic cleansing?

              • So I checked it out… never directly states where the data is from (“PRC state media and data”, “party documents and data reportedly obtained from local public security bureaus in Xinjiang”, it continues to be this vague never specific throughout), most of the dates end in 2021/2022 (for the latter e.g. “the last date for which authorities have issued such reports”, so that doesn’t show it hasn’t ended in 2021)

                The closest thing you have in there is

                the continued elevated number of indictments in 2022 suggests that the campaign continues

                Are there other, better, sources?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            53 months ago

            Crimes against humanity aren’t war crimes. You’re reading comprehension is lacking my friend. The war in war crimes means warfare.

            Speaking of genocides. You have mentioned two. Most genocides on the planet are actively done by America and it’s allies or it supplies the weapons and silences the media.

            Considering China having 5 times the population of america. Id say china has been very good comparatively on the world. Also nothing to say how 4 of 5 of your war crimes weren’t at all war crimes??

    • Big Miku
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      The inner battle of not issuing a final warning, duh. Truly a vicious war.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      53 months ago

      Yeah, not really comparable when it comes to war crimes. If someone wanted to conflate a topic that makes both countries look similarly bad in an honest light, it would be the treatment of ethnic minorities.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        That would not be an honest light. China actually takes their affirmative action seriously and not just pays lip service to it while continuing to enact genocidal policies like the US still does on the indigenous peoples of the mainland and occupied Hawai’i which has been gentrified and settled to the point of being unlivable for most of the locals.

        The claims of China’s abuse of ethnic minorities are a scam espoused by the same people profitting off the genocide in Palestine. Anybody who takes the evidence seriously instead of treating accusations as trustworthy because of the volume of them doesn’t understand (or chooses to ignore) how the US propaganda machine has always worked.

        People still on that “China genocide” bs are about as ridiculous as people claiming Iraq had WMDs into the Obama years. It’s a level of gullibility so big that it has to be voluntary.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          enact genocidal policies like the US still does on the indigenous peoples of the mainland and occupied Hawai’i which has been gentrified and settled to the point of being unlivable for most of the locals.

          And the same has been said about tibet, inner Mongolia, and xinjiang. I mean you can look at Chinas own census data and see that han Chinese are migrating to cities in xinjiang, displacing ethnic minorities to move away from their cultural cities.

          The claims of China’s abuse of ethnic minorities are a scam espoused by the same people profitting off the genocide in Palestine. Anybody who takes the evidence seriously instead of treating accusations as trustworthy because of the volume of them doesn’t understand (or chooses to ignore) how the US propaganda machine has always worked.

          You are conflating the accusations of genocide in one region with the accusations of ethnic discrimination. Even in that grey zone article it is conflating the study from some weird neocon group with all investigations into ethnic discrimination in China.

          Han chauvinism is an established concept that even Mao took aims to curtail. Something they are still combating considering there has only been one ethnic minority to serve in the central committee in the last 35 years.

          An actual criticism that I have about Xi is that he is a bit culturally conservative. The belt and road initiative utilized a lot of han centric language and the current central committee is notably the first committee that has no women serving on it in the last +25 years.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        73 months ago

        the treatment of ethnic minorities

        You mean the US having the highest prison population in the world, to the point of 1 in 5 black men over 30 having been to jail at some point of their lives?

      • ClathrateG [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        ? The UN has thoroughly investigated and concluded that the ‘Uyghur genocide’ is a fabrication https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/country-reports/ohchr-assessment-human-rights-concerns-xinjiang-uyghur-autonomous-region I suggest you read it rather than have it filtered through biased western media orgs, and I trust their investigation a lot more than those from countries like the US that have a vested interest in painting China as negatively as possible

        Even if the propaganda were true it would constitute a crime against humanity not a war crime, unless you consider the ETIM terror campaign a ‘war’

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          43 months ago

          Chinese shills don’t even read their own posts.

          Fucking disappointing to see lemmy to be taken over by ccp sympathizers.

          Next people here are gonna explain how students in Tiananmen Massacre deserved what they got.

          Cya lemmy it was nice for a time!

          • FunkyStuff [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            93 months ago

            The students in Tiananmen Square did get exactly what they deserved. A safe evacuation after the fighting in the streets surrounding the square got too intense.

          • davel [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            123 months ago

            It’s true, your screenshot shows no war crimes. You failed at sarcasm.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              I was agreeing with them, I posted the conclusion to show people they’ve not commited war crimes, just “serious human rights violations”. Sorry if my intentions didn’t come through in my comment.

          • ClathrateG [none/use name]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            That has no mention of a war that has China as a belligerent, can you specify which war you think these crimes are occurring as part of? and specify them?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 months ago

              I’m agreeing with you, the CCP hasn’t commited any war crimes, just “serious human rights violations”

              • ClathrateG [none/use name]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                4
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Ok, but there is a difference between the two, and no one here said China hasn’t committed serious human rights violations, they have and I condemn it like I condemn all serious human right violations including those committed by the US and it’s allies, domestically and in the numerous recent and ongoing invasions, wars and conflicts they’ve started, in addition to their war crimes

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          53 months ago

          A fabrication? Did you even read that pdf? I quote:

          Serious human rights violations have been committed in XUAR in the context of the Government’s application of counter-terrorism and counter-“extremism” strategies. The implementation of these strategies, and associated policies in XUAR has led to interlocking patterns of severe and undue restrictions on a wide range of human rights. These patterns of restrictions are characterized by a discriminatory component, as the underlying acts often directly or indirectly affect Uyghur and other predominantly Muslim communities.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    233 months ago

    They are both wrong.

    The correct way is to argue passionately that your country has committed the MOST war crimes/genocides/human rights violations. Ya know, bragging rights.