Its a space of 1meter×1meterx1meter, basically a cubic meter where the matter replicator works on. (So, no replicating cars, since its too big)

How do you min-max this?

  • Lemminary
    link
    fedilink
    73 months ago

    Let’s be honest, it’ll be nothing but dildos and fleshlights for the first year and a half. We’ll be swimming in life-like toy dicks before anyone realizes we can do anything else with it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Life-like? Do you realize how long of a tentacle you could coil into a cubic meter? It’d be like that tool assisted perfect game of Snake, but in 3 dimensions…

  • slazer2au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13 months ago

    You say it can create an object of a single M3.

    I create a second one by replicating the parts.

    May take a while but when the second one comes online the third one will be even faster.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      I feel the astounding energy needed to create matter would be the reason for the cooldown, so having more than one would make little difference.

      • slazer2au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        My reading of the question implies that the replicator has the cool down. so having a second one will have an independent cool down.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        It can’t be the energy. It has to be a matter rearranger, not something that makes matter from raw energy. Consider a cubic meter of water. It will have a mass of 1000 kg. By E=mc^2, that water has a mass energy of 9e19 Joules. New homes in the US are built with 200 amp panels, delivering power at 120V. The typical new home can draw up to 24,000 Watts from the grid.

        At this max output, it would take a house 120 million years to draw enough electricity to create a cubic meter of water from nothing but pure electrical energy.

        So this thing must actually work as a matter rearranger. You provide it a supply of pure elements and it synthesizes from there. Or, if it’s fancy, it creates elements by rearranging nuclei. But it can’t be something that truly creates matter ex nihilo.

  • tiredofsametab
    link
    fedilink
    253 months ago

    Replicate the replicator. Next day, use both to replicate replicators. Repeat ad nauseam.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 months ago

      Have the replicator print a replicator that auto-prints identical copies of itself as often as it can so you can cause the collapse of reality without having to be involved.

      Hell, have the replicator print a replicator without the 24-hour cooldown to hurry things along a little

  • I Cast Fist
    link
    fedilink
    33 months ago

    The main thing is positioning in order to reduce wasted space as much as possible. As someone with a 3D printer, I have a teensy bit of an idea on how to position “ready-made” to maximize space. I certainly cannot print/replicate a fully mounted car frame in a single cubic meter, but I can print parts of the frame in such a way that I can mount them like legos, if each rod is 5x5x99cm, I can fit roughly 361 (19x19, with a bit of space between them so they don’t come fused) in the cubic meter. Is that enough to make the whole frame? No idea.

    Also, think about it, 1 cubic meter of sandwiches, tacos, pizza and other junk food tasting great AND being perfectly healthy. Damn, now I’m hungry.

  • Jeffool
    link
    fedilink
    23 months ago

    Everyone’s talking about money, but I’d try to eliminate costs. First day I make some food and a couple of (full) power banks. Next few days I make some food and solar panels.

    I know you say no cars, but I have family I’d trust to put one together. (I’d trust them to take mine apart to work on it.) The only odd part would be body panels? Similarly I’d try to figure out some small housing a cubic meter at a time, but that’s probably also a work in progress.

    I’d mix in a few personal items over the coming days of course. A new PC, new clothes, and food variety. I don’t know how to get rid of Internet and land costs. I wonder if the resulting economic crash might lead to that being figured out for everyone, but I somehow doubt that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13 months ago

    Well, that gives you infinite energy, since you can produce energy-containing stuff.

    Hmm.

    On one hand, a lot of competition for resources go away.

    On the other hand, that’s also pretty disruptive.

    I think that that world is going to have a lot of sudden challenges. You don’t have scarcity of any material or existing item that you can break down to less than a 1m cube unless you need it in great bulk, but you also have no ability to control production of things like firearms, explosives, drugs, physical proofs of identity, missiles, weaponized drones, etc.

    I can imagine countries or organizations trying to seize the supply of replicators.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      You might like the novel Singularity Sky. It’s about a planet, artificially maintained at a 19th-century tech level by its authoritarian government, which is suddenly visited by a post-scarcity civilization. Cellphones begin to rain from the sky all over the planet and whoever picks one up is given an offer: Tell us a story and we’ll give you anything you desire. One person asks for a self-replicating replicator with a fully stocked blueprint library and it ends up being extremely disruptive in many of the ways you’re imagining.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    113 months ago

    You mean after gold and diamonds essentially become worthless? A lot of people would definitely use it for medications.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      33 months ago

      Me getting a cubic meter of each ADHD drugs see if any works better than mine… Except on sunday, I get my weekly supply of coca cola

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Obviously everybody now has high end computers, cameras, a variety of lenses, phones, etc. Foldable Ebikes like the aipas would fit in the space.

    1 meter solar panels are a hit but since most batteries and capacitors require materials difficult to handle it becomes highly demanded.

    Every political building now has thick blastproof exteriors as making bombs has never been easier, judges live in the courthouse now.

  • snooggums
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23 months ago

    A few people could easily coordinate to have one person ceeate food, another clothing and essentials, and another could create charged batteries or other energy producing objects. Hell, with a little planning you wouldn’t even need to coordinate really.

    At that point the world is basically post scarcity and anyone can do anything, kinda like star trek.

    Assuming no limitations on what it can make we will also be at the stage of mutually assured destruction since everyone can make a mini nuke each day they don’t need something else. This will either discourage violence or wipe out large areas of the planet depending on how fast the technology is distributed, as everyone getting it overnightbwill absolutely lead to a lot of damage in areas where conflict is happening. Not to mention oppressive governments trying to control the populations replicators.

  • Can I adjust dimensions? Like, can I replicated a car, but a tiny one that will fit in a 1x1x1m cube?

    If so, I’d replicate 1/8th of the replicator, but double sized. Repeat for all other parts, assemble, and now I have a 2m³ replicator. Repeat until I have one big enough to replicate a house.

    Then, the whole point of the exercise: replicate a house-sized Funyun.

  • Libra00
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    3 months ago
    1. Make a nuclear bomb. You don’t need a whole ICBM, a single MIRV warhead can fit in the available space.
    2. Threaten to set it off if everyone in the area doesn’t give me their fabricator.
    3. Expand operations/nuke delivery range.
    4. Have a monopoly on the means of production again.

    This is how people brainwashed by capitalism would use it to deprive us all of the post-scarcity future. We can only hope some more reasonable people also think of making nukes first so we can at least have some mutually assured destruction to preserve the fully automated luxury gay space communism.

      • Libra00
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Not MIRV, a MIRV warhead - as in a single warhead from the payload of a MIRV missile. And the reason is because regular warheads wouldn’t fit in the 1m3 space.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      This is how people brainwashed by capitalism would use it to deprive us all of the post-scarcity future.

      That doesn’t work out. Unfortunately.

      Reason:

      When it was politicians who fought the Cold War, they were few who had actually a say, and these few got some minimum brain, at least.

      But in your scenario, it is random jerks who execute that scheme everywhere. There will be some who pull the trigger just for … all kinds of stupid shit that has triggered them. So you’d have nukes going off somewhere, at least every few days, and then nobody can really rule the world anymore with them. The power of the threat will be gone.

      • Libra00
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        Politicians didn’t fight the Cold War. It wasn’t pasty fat men in their 60s training the Mujahideen in Afghanistan or on the front lines of Korea or any of a dozen other proxy wars. Politicians, as a rule, tend to avoid things that pose a serious risk to their health (which makes it kind of ironic that they tend to spend their careers putting other people in proximity to those things instead, doesn’t it?)

        Eh… maybe one or two. But most people (like the politicians above, funnily enough) tend to have a pretty strong survival instinct. I agree it would absolutely be chaos, but most people wouldn’t think of making a nuke, much less know what kind of nuke they should make, or even how to make one in a 1m3 box, they would just get regular guns and chemical weapons and shit. Still lots of chaos. Just less radiation.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Mujahideen in Afghanistan or on the front lines of Korea or any of a dozen other proxy wars.

          I do not count these as the Cold War.

          Proxy wars have their special funding and maybe false motives, but they are hot wars. Real wars.

          The Cold War consisted of threats. Piling up weapons, bombs, nukes, and counting and comparing who’s got more of them. These threats were made mainly by politicians. Maybe I was wrong in saying they “fought” it.

          • Libra00
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            …okay. Historians do, though, so I hope you understand if I go with them on this one. Also those were just examples, if you don’t like them there are plenty of other proxy wars you can pick from to see my point illustrated pretty much everywhere.

            That’s fair though, it was more than just one thing, and like most things in life it’s far more complex than it seems on the surface. I just take particular exception to any suggestion that politicians in any way risked their neck for literally anything ever.

  • Lovable Sidekick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    We know it can replicate multiple objects at once, because tea earl grey hot and the cup it comes in are multiple objects, and Picard often gets it on a saucer as well. So I would create a pile of everything I need for that day.