Sure, except the resistance will constantly change with time, temperature and other environmental variables.

Mathematically yes. Practically, right now? No.

So you need a resistor of this value for your widget.

For that many places of precision you’re looking at a potentiometer with a 10 nano-ohm precision.

I am not aware of any commercially available resistor that can do that but you could create one using microelectronic structures used for ICs and derive a 10 nano-ohm resistor by design and then chain enough of these elements into a resistor network or potentiometer to create the super precise resistance value you want.

Cool, congratulations.

Now how are you going to use this 10 nano-ohm resistor? What voltage will you be applying across it? What current do you expect it to handle? And therefore what are your power requirements? What are your tolerances, how much can the true value deviate from the designed ideal?

Because power generates heat through losses, and that will affect the resistance value so how tightly do you need to manage the power dissipation?

How will you connect to this resistor to other circuit components? Because a super precise resistor on it’s own is nothing but an over-engineered heating element.

If you tried connecting other surface mount devices (SMDs) from the E24 or even E96 series to this super precise resistor then the several orders of magnitude wider tolerances of these other components alone will swallow any of the precision from your super accurate resistor.

So now your entire circuit has to be made to the same precision else all of your design work has been wasted.

Speaking of which, now your heat management solution now needs to be super precise as well and before you know it you’ve built the world’s most accurate widget that probably took billions of dollars/euros/schmeckles and collaboration from the worlds leading engineers and scientists that probably cost more time and money than the Large Hadron Collider.

9 significant figures? good luck!

The tolerance would be greater than the difference anyway.

Yes

Don’t sneeze right next to it with that kind of precision.

For starters resistance changes with temperature.

Also even in a multi-turn potentiometer, getting a precision of 1 in 10^9 would require an equal level of precision in the angle you rotate that potentiometer to (for example, a 0.1 degree error in a 10 turn potentiometer - which I believe is more turns than anything that actually can be bought - translates into a 1 in 36,000 error in resistance, so about 3000 larger than 10^9) even if you had a perfect material whose resistance doesn’t change with temperature.

(PS: Just out of curiosity I went and dove down further and to translate a 1/3000 deg movement in a rotating potentiometer into a 1mm movement at the end of a bar attached to it, you would need a 176m long bar - i.e. the radius for 1/(360*3000) of a circumference to be equal to 1mm, is aproximatelly 176 m. This of course has serious mechanical problems even if you remove the bar at the end of the process as the removal process itself would shift the potentiometer by much more than 1/3000 degrees)

The joke here isn’t even specifically about resistances and electronics, it’s that the real world has all sorts of limitations that when you’re doing things wholly in the mathematical world you don’t have to account for, and that’s a hard realisation for Physicists (having gone to study Physics at uni and then half way in my degree changing to Electronics Engineering I can tell you that’s one of the shocks I had to deal with in the transition).

(In a way, it’s really a joke about Theoretical Physicists)

See also the “assuming this chicken is a spherical ovoid” kind of joke.

I had a potentiometer on a circuit board that adjusted a timer, but I found that the timer varied in timing. I ended up replacing with a few resistors and it corrected the variations.

Can we do a fraction of an electron boss? The economy is kind of rough. Guy on the phone says he can do a time share too.

Whats wrong with your 3!

Real world resistors usually have a tolerance of ±5%, so you’ll never get anything that precise.

Trimmable precision resistor.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_trimming

Until finding out about finite measurement resolution

Numbers like that should have been why you kept going in mech E.

Once you get past the educational stage, every one of those calculations becomes “OK now round to the closest whole number that gives you the larger factor of safety and move on”

After calculus though, they just expect you to cope with fucked up coefficients. In Diff Eq, sometimes you do just get something like 3/111 cos (6/111 x). It gets harder to come up with examples that work out with nice integers.

Physics can also have some really beautiful math, look at Lissajous figures. Once you understand the connections between e, the imaginary plane, and sine/cosine, you get some profound understandings about how electric and magnetic fields work.

I actually really like physics, and it’s 100% because I’m fucked up and evil

The trick is to round everything. Pi? Basically 3.

I can assure you they are not.

Too true, and my problem is about to be your problem and the cycle continues comrade.

Not using the correct resistors does cause a U problem every once in a while.

OK, the solution is “how accurate will make the physicist and accountants both only kinda mad”

Sounds like a 6 ohm resistor solution.

I’m not an engineer

First, assume a spherical resistor in a vacuum, that can also dissipate heat with 100% efficiency.

Now that we’re in physics land, anything is possible.

A big aspect of good design is being able to solve an issue as succinctly as possible, with as wide an operating range as possible. Lower tolerance requirements = better.

If you need that level of precision, you might want to reconsider your career in circuit design.

Its funny the first thing I thought of was, at what temperature.