Summary

The EU plans to fine Elon Musk’s X over $1 billion for violating the Digital Services Act by failing to control disinformation and illicit content.

This would mark the first major penalty under the new law and could trigger a legal clash with Musk, who vowed to fight in court.

Regulators say the fine aims to deter other platforms. Tensions with the U.S. are rising, as X also faces a broader investigation.

  • mechoman444
    link
    fedilink
    English
    815 days ago

    When are we going to learn that this doesn’t work.

    Elon will make back that billion back in a short enough time that it won’t matter!

    Start taking percentages of their income! Company needs to pay 30% of their revenue for ten years.

    That’ll put the fear god in them!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    315 days ago

    The EU uses selective prosecution for political ambitions. We are all going to watch the trans-Atlantic relationship crumble.

  • Lucy :3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1115 days ago

    “Up to”, in the context of fining non-private entities, usually means the minimum possible (so probably like 50€) and a “next time it’s double!”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2615 days ago

    Only a matter of time until this guy buys Reddit.

    I call it in 2026. So glad I’m out of that place.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1415 days ago

        Sadly, you’re right. Although if the the extreme aggression coming from the US government continues, they might actually get prodded into doing something about it eventually.

      • aname
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4015 days ago

        At least they have the balls to impose 1 billion euro penalties.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2915 days ago

          “Plans to” has as much value as “slams” when it comes to real world impact. I’d love to be proven wrong and have the new title become “actually fines”, but I have my doubts.

          • "no" banana
            link
            fedilink
            English
            315 days ago

            The difference is that the judicial branch needs to be thorough and build a case. Planning to is all they can do until they actually do.

            If Shitter is found to do something illegal that should land them a fine that is what will happen.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            515 days ago

            With the current (digital) regulatory landscape (e.g. GDPR, DMA, DSA and the AI Act that is entering into force in multiple stages right now), the EU has proven to be quite resolute and decisive with their fines and measures. This is all partof their digital de ade stategy and more legislation is coming to tame these tech behemoths. Yes, it isn’t always fast or efficiënt, but the EU seems to be only world power that actually has the balls to do something.

            This reminds me of EDPB Guidelines that have been published last year. In it, the EDPB had said that in extreme cases, AI models that have been trained on unlawfully obtained data such as personal data without a ground of proxessing etc., nationale authorites may compel the violating developer to delete the whole model. I do not see it happening soon or often, but it is a very good sign that the European authority mentions this as a possible action and outcome in an official document.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            915 days ago

            I’m optimistic that it will happen eventually. The EU generally is moving with stuff like this, even though it is slow as fuck. But well, let’s see, not promising anything…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      “Worth” only according to its owner, who paid himself to buy it from himself under a different org. Good luck finding an outside investor willing to spend $30B on it now that it’s turned into a hate pool with a shit revenue stream

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1315 days ago

        The last people to evaluate the company under the rules of fiduciary responsibility put the value at $10 billion.

        Musk gets away with this because people believe his Ponzi schemes will make them rich. In a first world country he would be in prision for fraud.