• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 month ago

    “Yes, the pronounced hammer coefficients as evidenced by these repeated indentations in the flattened curve…”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 month ago

    Funny how beating a defenseless creature to death with a hammer was just seen as another everyday activity for your typical Saint.

    • 7empest
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      Cull the outliers… Not low enough

      Transform the data… Not low enough

      Normalise the data… Not low enough

      Alter the model by adding random effects… Not low enough.

      The major factors showed a trend towards significance… therefore our hypothesis was met.

      Hello PhD

    • Ecco the dolphin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Fucking lol. I can’t believe that shit’s real and from Reuters of all places.

      I couldn’t find the graph on an original Reuters article (they must have gotten embarrassed and pulled it down lmao), but Business Insider still has it on their version of the article

      (edit: and this is just time vs murders, not time vs gun deaths, a better statistic for this)

        • Kogasa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 month ago

          I thought at first the point was that murders had gone down because they were suddenly technically legal. The inverted scale thing is worse

        • wia
          link
          fedilink
          English
          171 month ago

          I know :)

          my reply was in disbelief.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      that can’t be real… why would gun deaths go down after such a law is passed? I don’t understand the world…

      Edit: Oh I read the other comments. Yeah that scale is stupid.