The narrative that the EU targets China in a way somehow analogous to Trump is also weird. It just follows a clearly defined law. There was an actual investigation on who and how makes competition unequal to EU company, not claims out of nowhere as in the US.
Let’s talk about others. I invite the Dutch people to tell us who they would like to see rise in this election.
PVV has been dropping in polls for more than a year now. Let’s hope this is the last time they are in a ruling coalition.
I don’t get it. What should the brexiters railing about Poles make others realise? That if you are rich, you destroy vocational schools to get richer, get people from abroad to do basic service and construction jobs that almost nobody in your country is educated to perform, and then make them the scapegoat once your own policies fail the people?
And in a generally quite good journal…
Well, science hippies and their humour ¯_(ツ)_/¯
I mean, not that worse things haven’t passed the peer review…
Links or it didn’t go through the peer review
Overall. I wonder, if somebody gives me a Lambo, can I sell it, buy a bus, and drive friends in it?
I wonder which one is more expensive, a new Lamborghini or a new bus.
You mean just take the bus?
Yes, but… Let’s say papers A, B, and C are introducing methods. Often, each paper will choose to show the benchmarks in which their tool was the best. In reality, each tool might be better for a different task. If you understand the tools, and have gotten used to this kind of papers, you will probably get what each tool is good for. But the papers themselves are misleading, and people often just blindly use the “cutting edge” for everything.
"I shall exercise against you my right of rejection because you have treated me with contempt.”
This sounds like basically every description of modern digital/statistical tool
Only recently, I watched The Wind Rises and I loved it. I do not know what it is. It still has the sensitivity and the aesthetics of Ghibli under Miyazaki, which I genuinely love, but at the same time shows a confusing and unobvious real-life story, and very real dilemmas.
Thanks, that is an amazing resource! You can see yearly emissions, which are statistics. And when you click on a country/region, you get the breakdown by energy source for the electricity grid.
Note: Living in Sweden, I am still Polish, and looking at this map is embarrassing to say the least…
I care about two things with the sanctions.
And yes, do not expect change from within coming just from the suffering of the people in the East. Support the opposition and independent media channels. As a Polish, I understand how important that was during the Cold War. But do not have your hopes too high for a quick fix.
I understand, that the data here is per capita, but I thought even per capita in Europe, and especially in Sweden, we install little compared to the rest of the world.
The three leading countries share borders with Russia or Belarus. Is this recognition of the security and resilience advantages of deploying millions of solar panels and thousands of wind turbines compared with a few large fossil and nuclear power stations?
Wow, this is very different from the view media gave me.
I live in Sweden. The perspective from the media was, for me, that Sweden has stagnated in renewable energy, while the UK, Spain, and some other countries lead the way in Europe. And that while Europe was first in the renewable game, it is now in the developing countries that most action happens.
The data from this report shows that basically all of my claims from the previous paragraph are wrong.
No opinion here about the state of development, just amazement how misleading the media narrative have been for me.
Thanks for sharing!
Maybe first put a carbon tax on fuels used in aviation? LOL
Petrol is reasonable, depending on how it is rolled out. The heating should be fixed by the state and the EU, not taxed. Like heating networks and heat pumps.