• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      These idiots are real and I encounter them in real life. What’s very common is nonsense about how the “West” and Nato blaa screwed over poor Vlad and so on.

      You cannot put your phone down in real life.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        It’s literally a current point of major conflict in the German Left party, half of the party aligns with Sarah Wagenknecht, and says that Putin is fighting NATO Imperialism by bombing Ukrainian hospitals.

    • vlad
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If someone denies the existence of the WW2 Holocaust people come out of the woodworks to publicly tell them that they are wrong. At this point we collectively agree that believing that is idiotic.

      The massacre on the Tiananmen Square, which my phone apparent doesn’t even have in its dictionary, is something being actively denied by a major world government. It’s a topic that the corporations that run a lot of or information exchange infrastructure are trying to avoid mentioning.

      I think it’s that active avoidance of the topic that rubbs people the wrong way. And we all like to poke fun of people who are delusional.

      Oh and also Holodomor. Until my old country started to roll tanks into Ukraine people on the internet kept telling me how I’m wrong and it didn’t happen. They they’d say that it was actually a logistics issue. How do you accidentally kill millions of people through starvation when it’s those same people that are producing the food to begin with? At least now we all agree that Holodonor existed.

    • Adramis [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      24
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      We’re defederated from the worst offenders. Do you have an account on an instance that’s federated with Lemmygrad / Hexbear? Because it’s bad.

      For what it’s worth, we have a local tankie group at one of our college campuses nearby that really sucks in a lot of people from the queer community. They’re pretty much all universally combative, dominate any political space they’re in with “Voting has no point, just stop voting (shockedpikachu.jpg when fascists take office, consolidate power, and make life hell for minorities)” or “I’d rather vote for Trump to accelerate the decline of the world so the revolution is easier / faster” or “The holodomor was a Ukrainian man-made disaster to make Russia look bad, therefore wasn’t a genocide, and you’re a racist for believing it was”. Fortunately once they get off campus and into the real world most of them chill out, but Eternal September means they’re a constant menace to our local queer community.

      Are they as big of a problem in the US as conservatives? Not remotely, though there’s some surprising overlap in their support of Russia that might make them a scarier force than expected. They’re still worth bitching about and deriding though.

      The rest of the world, though? Russia and China are literally committing genocide, right now, and these people are cheering that on. There’s some European parties who are gaining in power who align with pro-Russia, pro-China goals. They might not be the main threat, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t a threat.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          They’re just authoritarians. Right wing vs left wing doesn’t change how destructive authoritarianism is, it just changes who gets attracted to it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’d rather vote for Trump to accelerate the decline of the world so the revolution is easier / faster

        It always astounds me that people who have enough intelligence to read so much doctrine (some of which does have value) give in to such ends-means justification. The “revolution” is not inevitable, nor is its victory, nor is its success in making life that much better. Sacrificing others’ lives and well-being in the here and now has zero justification because there’s no guarantee that it will make any situation any better. They’re just zealots

        • Adramis [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          For what it’s worth, the people I knew IRL who said this did end up voting and did not vote for Trump, but I still wonder how damaging that rhetoric could’ve been if people hadn’t been willing to argue with it.

          But yeah, that was a mind-boggling shouting match conversation to have.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      You weren’t wrong. The reason is because a unified left is an incredibly powerful and dangerous thing, so there is a ton of effort put into dividing the left, and since much of it is crafted to appeal to base moral superiority far too many on the left are happy to take the bait without hesitation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I disagree with the “criticism is just giving them a platform” thing. It’s not giving them a platform. That would require allowing them to speak and letting their ideas go unchallenged. And there is a large leftist presence on here, which imo is a good thing. It provides an opportunity to combat misinformation. I will concede that online political shit slinging is often unproductive between the people commenting. But I’ve learned a lot as a lurker reading through these arguments. Reading arguments have given me things to read about and form my own opinion on. Perhaps the ones involved in the argument won’t have their minds changed but that doesn’t mean someone uninvolved reading it won’t be convinced or at least have their interest piqued.

      A lot of mainstream political discourse excludes leftists. And I feel it’s a big reason people are dissatisfied with the state of modern politics (especially the US). When “both sides” are on the same side where it matters most, it’s obvious that neither of them have an interest in changing the trajectory the country/world is on. This leads to people looking for answers outside of the mainstream, because our states are failing and in denial. When you have an inherent distrust of the system and start looking for alternative perspectives and analysis, “stigmatized knowledge” becomes normal and informs a lot of your perspective. This creates a space for people acting in bad faith to take advantage of those who, through decades of concentrated effort by people (often within or adjacent to our own governments), have had their capacity for critical thinking and reasoning eroded. Leading to conspiratorial thinking.

      Further complicating things, there are a lot of conspiracy theories that are correct and true. COINTELPRO and MKULTRA for example. They both sound like some tinfoil hat bullshit but the CIA has literally admitted to both and hundreds of documents on these programs have been declassified. When people are in the process of deconstructing the ideologies they’ve been raised on, these bad actors are in a perfect place to manipulate them. With these things in mind it’s easy to see how going from “capitalism is bad” and “western propaganda misrepresented daily life in post-revolution USSR” can be twisted into “tianamen square was a psyop” and “modern Russia is justified in their invasion of Ukraine”.

      These things are further complicated by concepts like critical support and a vague, misguided sense of anti-imperialism, which are common in authoritarian left spaces. A sythesis of these two concepts leads to support of nations and parties that are objectively terrible in many areas that should not be ignored. When your ideology is twisted into “the west is bad and must be eliminated at any cost” you see countries like China and Russia as allies and as something to be replicated. It’s all very intentional.

      Conspiracy theories and bad takes infect every ideology. Democrats, republicans, fascists, Marxists, anarchists and everyone else aren’t immune to conspiratorial thinking. It’s something that needs to be consistently combatted. And the best way to do that is by speaking the truth unapologetically. Consensus reality has been broken and there is a power struggle going on every day to win hearts and minds. This in itself isn’t a bad thing, the status quo is cruel and coercive. But it’s created a ripe space for those with bad intentions to steer the conversation towards areas that are favorable to them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      I’m not saying there aren’t Nazis, but at least the Nazis aren’t going around screaming about how right they are and denying the Holocaust. Those tankies were just going wild. So many pro-russia/China comments on everything. Calling the Ukrainian Nazis every chance they got.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        but at least the Nazis aren’t going around screaming about how right they are and denying the Holocaust.

        Erm, they kind of are though. The UN has just last year adopted a resolution against this, because it is an issue. The Chinese and the Russian bots are prevalent, but other nasty factions are still here.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Those are both true though?

    Even Wikipedia says there wasn’t a massacre in the square and that there were violent clashes where protesters killed cops.

    Kinda weak to talk shit about a group of people when you’re not even federated with em though…

    • Calavera
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      Ok so we have to be federated to a nazi instance to talk shit about nazis? What’s your point?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre

      “At the State Council press conference on 6 June, spokesman Yuan Mu said that “preliminary tallies” by the government showed that about 300 civilians and soldiers died, including 23 students from universities in Beijing, along with some people he described as “ruffians”.[229][238] Yuan also said some 5,000 soldiers and police were wounded, along with 2,000 civilians.”

      300 dead and 7,000 wounded sure soundss like a massacre

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        You gotta read the whole thing. There wasn’t significant violence in the square, but there absolutely was elsewhere in the area. So they’re right to say there wasn’t a massacre in the square.

        The soldiers don’t count towards the total unless you wanna claim it was a massacre of pap and pla members.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Can someone ELI5 of what tankies are? It’s just something I haven’t run into in the USA (that I know of), and I’m baffled where and how they would fit into my understanding of the left and right on the USA political structure

    • Franzia
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      In the US, tankies are usually the people who worship Soviet Russia and the USSR. In current politics, they often support Russia in the Ukraine conflict.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        So here is what I find baffling - the people supporting Russia are the right wingers here, yet as far as I know they are not tankies… Nothing makes sense

        • Franzia
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Tankies defy logic and often their reactionary takes will land them on the same side of an issue with right-wingers. Usually using very different rhetoric, but in this one case… the right and the tankies sound pretty much the same.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s simply communists who want communism not to make everybody equal, but because they want their turn at the top of the social hierarchy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        Hey! I’m not interested in the social heirarchy.

        I just have the people skills of a hand grenade that was recently divorced from its pin. I crave a tightly planned economy to provide highly deterministic relationships and rules, so I don’t have to schmooze and soft-sell my way to success. The spreadsheet says I’m a good worker!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      252 years ago

      As someone who’s wondered this myself but only now found the enthusiasm to look it up because I can’t be arsed to do anything for myself but this is what Wikipedia says:

      “Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to communists who express support for one-party communist states that are associated with Marxism–Leninism, whether contemporary or historical.”

      Take it with a grain of salt tho people misuse labels like this all the time

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        182 years ago

        I think that definition is pretty accurate about almost everybody I’ve seen being called a Tankie on lemmy.

        The term was originated in the UK in the 60s by leftists who opposed the USSR’s tank-led occupations of Prague and Budapest. In that context “tankie” kinda makes sense.

      • archomrade [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        I think this is actually pretty fair, but one thing I’ll add is that the implication of the word (being a reference to the use of tanks to put down revolts) is that tankies support the use of state violence against opposition

        I have not found that to be true about many who are accused of being a tankie

  • Guildo
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    There’s another theory, which capitalists don’t wanna hear. It would disturb them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      There’s a theory that you guys don’t want to hear because it would disturb you 😏

      Actually we do want to hear it

      … no.

      • Guildo
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Don’t wanna tell, because it would be a lot of work - let’s give a few hints: The protesters were singing The Internationale and Deng Xiaoping was a revionist and not a marxist.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          232 years ago

          “My girlfriend lives in Canada, you wouldn’t know her.”

          • Little1Lost
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            So you cant proof that you have one -> you dont have one mimimimimimimiii /s

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            452 years ago

            I can prove that it was a hoax. I just don’t want to.

          • Guildo
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            It would include a lot of translations and giving links to videos, which are probably already deleted. So, it doesn’t make sense to elobarate. Nobody would believe anyways.

              • Guildo
                link
                fedilink
                19
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Nobody will believe it and I got over 100 downvotes. So here you go: China was making liberal changes after Mao and moved away from marxism. The leadership changed and Deng Xiaoping moved ahead to shitty deals for the citizens. Deng openly admitted, that he believed in confucianism and wanted to make changes towards it. A lot of the citizens were unhappy with it and wanted more socialism - which includes more democracy - but also changes to better working-conditions. Because Deng and the new leaders didn’t want that, they moved forward with tanks and military.

                tl:dr: socialists were on the streets and were fought with tanks - the tankies were confucianists, who wanted more capitalism

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  172 years ago

                  tl:dr: socialists were on the streets and were fought with tanks - the tankies were confucianists, who wanted more capitalism

                  Damn that was a lot of work indeed. Can’t believe you managed to do it.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  122 years ago

                  There may be a grain of truth in that. I’m glad you explained yourself. I definitely appreciate that these things are nor black and white.

                  Would you say the protestors wanted more socialism’s but not more Mao-style communism?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              642 years ago

              What an easy way to peddle bullshit. Just say something is true and then refuse to do any work to prove it.

            • AnonTwo
              link
              fedilink
              39
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              We don’t wanna hear about it so badly that critics won’t even talk about it when asked. Damn.

  • -☆-
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    From what I read (yes I actually read the walls of text they post) the two weren’t exclusive. There were violent protestors during that time, and the protests in the square were minor, nonviolent, and opposed by dispersion via an announcement rather than tanks.

    I’m not sure if I believe all that, but it’s better to know what they’re actually saying, imo

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    The US 4th Psyops literally advertises their involvement in organizing the Tiananmen protests in their recruiting materials.

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        Tbh when I was younger and more impressionable… Neo Nazis pretending to just be conspiracy theorists and metaphysical truth seekers told me about how some things “Really don’t add up” about the “official story” and there’s no harm in “just asking questions”

        And I might have bought into it, but they were too quick to follow it up with some shit about how Jews “would have deserved it”

        Idiots shouldn’t have shown their hand until I folded.

        Good thing I’m smart and Nazis are dumb

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      Speaking as a connoisseur of propaganda, of course both are true.

      20 or 30 [certainly no more than 253] protesters, mostly drug addicts and mental defectives, were riled up by a vast CIA conspiracy to commit start a riot.

  • iByteABit [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    Tiananmen Square Protests Wiki

    Read about the death toll in and around Tiananmen itself. Around 300 people from both sides died in Beijing, but there is little evidence to support that thousands of protesters were killed in Tiananmen. There have been articles from western sources from reporters who admit that they weren’t actually present when they wrote about the incident.

    I’m not a tankie, but half-reading and twisting what they say to ridicule them only makes you look bad. The situation was actually much more complex than you want to believe.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Red states like Florida are trying to make slavery out to be something that was beneficial to black people. So we aren’t far off from China. I grew up in a purple state (WI) and my history classes were all over the place. Didn’t help matters that I was tossed in the remedial classes cause of my ADHD, which just dumbed things down a lot instead of doing anything helpful for me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        I grew up in a red state. Looking back now that i’ve read more and had opportunities to learn from others of different backgrounds, I can definitively say they omitted events and details to present a more white-washed (pun intended) version of history. I wouldn’t say my teachers tried to justify slavery, but there was an outsized emphasis placed on the “states’ rights” explanation of the civil war, and they were maybe a bit too quick to point out when former slaves went to work for their former masters (as if this was some evidence that they “were worse off” after emancipation, as opposed to being a reaction to poorly implemented, and/or straight-up racist, reconstruction policies).

        I’m glad your teachers didn’t shy away from the seedy underbelly of history. But I do want to point out that I didn’t even know how myopic my history education was until I got to college (not even from the classes, although those helped, but simply having a more diverse set of friends to talk with). I still learn new things that open my eyes to a whole other topic that I didn’t even know was a thing. Don’t assume, because you don’t know of any gaps in your education, that you don’t have any. (I’m sure you already know that, but I’m up on my soap box right now, and it seemed a nice conclusion)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    You saw the thread the other day too, huh.

    Yeah that was fucked. Gave me some insight into some Lemmy users that’s for sure.