Researchers found low concentrations of so-called forever chemicals in various “eco-friendly” straws, raising doubts about whether they’re an appropriate alternative.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    When the craze first started I remember seeing paper straws in plastic. Someone was close but didnt quite get it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      You do know that thin film clear “plastic” isn’t actually plastic right? Most of that is cellophane, which is made from plants and is biodegradable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        That’s why I used the word plastic and not “cellophane.” There were and still are companies that use non-biodegradable, non-plant based plastics to package their paper straws. But thank you…? I know you were going for a big internet gotcha moment there.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    Like 99% of people don’t need straws they just want them. Learn to drink like an adult and you’re good

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    532 years ago

    No comment on the level of PFAS aside from

    though the levels were low

    This is just feeding the outrage machine to get clicks. If it was a story they’d be citing concentration guidelines and telling you what concentrations were found in the products. It’s not a story, it’s rage bait.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Agreed. If it was “intentionally added” PFAS, it would say that, and that might be a big deal. I read through the article and didn’t see that. Just speculation that it might be. PFAS is everywhere.

    • volvoxvsmarla
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      I agree 99%. The 1% left is that, honestly, it is shitty that they contain any kind of PFAS to begin with. If PFAS in any kind of concentration are part of the production process, then it just isn’t sustainable in the long run.

      But the question is why do we need straws at all. I doubt that back in 1970 anyone would drink a latte macchiato with a straw. I found it strange just 15 years ago. If you fancy straws, you can get one high quality reusable one (steel, bamboo whatever) and carry it with you - I find this proposition much less offensive then expecting me to always carry a huge reusable cup with me. And for the most part you can consume drinks without a straw.

      Now, there is people who have disabilities that require them to use a straw. For them, have some in store as a vendor, and hand them out if requested.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        It really depends on the levels, they are called forever chemicals because they last forever. In many cities you can detect cocaine in drinking water…

        • volvoxvsmarla
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          But then it doesn’t depend on the level actually. If something toxic has a half life of a billion years then it shouldn’t be used in production, no matter in what amount/at what levels. Cocaine will degrade at some point and also not stay in your system forever so I would argue that there can be a safe level of cocaine in drinking water. (I mean it still shouldn’t be there, but it doesn’t cause trouble on the grander scheme of things.)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          (using secretive slightly agitated conspiracy voice) That’s how they getcha man… Cocaine in the water man… it’s in there on purpose… they get you hooked on the coke and to get it you keep drinking the water to get mooooore! EVERYONE THAT EVER DRANK WATER HAS DIED AT SOME POINT??? (walks away mumbling about tin foil hats and mind control)

  • DessertStorms
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    I knew I should have avoided the comments… The fact that defence of this bullshit ban still endures (and in the literal face of its failures) frustrates me beyond words.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      The plastic straws also contain PFAS anyway so paper still may be marginally better, but it’s definitely money and time that could have been better spent on a different environmental initiative. I’m happy to see plastic bags go, though. Can’t win em all

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      They may not be safe

      The researchers sampled 39 brands of straws made of paper, bamboo, glass, stainless steel and plastic. Of those, 27 were found to contain PFAS, though the concentrations were low.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        202 years ago

        Read the entire thing:

        Of the straws tested in the study, those made of paper were the most likely to contain PFAS: The chemicals were detected in 18 out of 20 brands. Four out of five bamboo straws sampled contained PFAS, compared to three out of four plastic straws and two out of five glass straws. All five stainless steel straws analyzed were PFAS-free.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I use glass ones personally - tried plastic ones but kept biting them 🤦‍♂️.

      Have you had any issues with rust on your straws? I’ve noticed some stainless steel stuff goes rusty if it’s been left on some other wet steel item for a while, although I have no idea why that happens

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    392 years ago

    Once in a restaurant I got some longe macaroni pasta as a straw and I still think this was genius.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Scientists in Belgium recently tested dozens of straws from supermarkets, retail stores and fast-food restaurants in the country, and found that the majority contained PFAS — a family of synthetic chemicals used in the manufacture of consumer products because they can resist stains, grease and water.

    Thimo Groffen, an author of the new study and environmental scientist at the University of Antwerp, said it’s not clear whether the manufacturers of the straws he analyzed are intentionally adding PFAS as a waterproof coating.

    Graham Peaslee, who studies PFAS at the University of Notre Dame and was not involved in the new research, said it’s possible manufacturers aren’t testing for the chemicals in their own products.

    Keith Vorst, director of the Polymer and Food Protection Consortium at Iowa State University, said some of the straws in the study exceeded the proposed EPA concentrations for water.

    Various states, including California, Colorado, New York and Oregon, have banned plastic straws from food establishments in the last five years, and chains like Starbucks have phased them out.

    The main reason is that the straws generally can’t be recycled, so they wind up in landfills, get burned in incinerators or become litter that contaminates oceans, rivers, lakes and streams.


    The original article contains 958 words, the summary contains 203 words. Saved 79%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        342 years ago

        This bot is terrible and I wish it would be banned. It’s basically just randomly selects snippets and it leaves out very important details.

        The actual article says that the concentrations are very low and they don’t even know if the manufacturer is intentionally putting them there or if they’re finding their way in from other sources during manufacture. Also says the bamboo straws may have been grown in soil containing PFAS.

        They even found PFAS on most of the glass straws.

        It’s concerning sure but the levels are so low that straws are the least of our concern when it comes to PFAS exposure.

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          It no longer uses ChatGPT for some reason, the algorithm it’s using now seems to be picking what it thinks is most important (turns out in an article of 1k words, it’s chosen the opening, introductions of important-sounding people, and a summary)

          It could benefit from a delete-on-many-downvotes like system, where that also notifies a human reviewer to look at the article, ultimately with the aim of improving the summarisation algorithm.

          I am biased in the sense that I like the bot, especially its ability to retrieve paywalled articles and negate the need to see cookie popups by visiting the site etc. With this article though it’s blatantly missed the mark.

      • Carighan Maconar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        It’s important to keep in mind that 75% of plastic straws also contain PFAS.

        The truth is, the PFAS stuff is independent of the main material of the straw* (yeah there’s an asterisk, sec on that). It just so happens that PFAS are really good when we need to have a material not stick to food stuff too well and become unhygienic during its intended use time.

        *: Straws from glass and metal are an exception because those materials naturally do not bind well to grease, liquids and stains. They don’t need an extra PFAS coating. But plastic, paper, bamboo, they virtually all do.

        That is to say, I would split the problem: We got the main material part done now, we’re no longer using plastic for it. Now to get the coating done and use something that degrades very quickly.

          • Carighan Maconar
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Absolutely not someone in that or any adjacent industry, so I would not know whether that’s a usable solution. Could work, I mean it is used for gummi bears. But there might also be a thing about how it only lasts in closed packs I would imagine, and unlike gummi bears - which are gone ~11,5 seconds after opening a pack - straws are often kept around for months after a few have been used. No clue. There’s probably a better solution than PFAS coating though, granted.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    PFAS is everywhere at this point. Unfortunately they’re reeeeeally good at what they’re designed for and they’re cheap. We’ll need viable alternatives so they can be phased out. I think they should be banned from products that don’t really need them like dental floss and hopefully we come up with an enzyme or something that can cheaply break it down in the environment.

    Side note, there has been at least one study that shows that donating blood regularly can reduce the amount of PFAS in your blood. This doesn’t solve the problem of the stuff being everywhere but it’s good to know you can remove it from your body over time.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Donating plasma is particularly good at reducing your blood PFAS, and they pay you for donating plasma in lots of places in the US

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Yep, I think you can donate plasma more often as well. Oneblood will give you giftcards and swag for whole blood, not nearly as good a payout as plasma but it’s also like 15 minutes where my experience with plasma was a couple hours, they did set me up with netflix during the process so I think it’s worth the extra bit of time.

    • Dept
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      straws are better for your teeth when drinking soda

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Me when it’s time to see the dentist. Straws do protect your teeth from a lot of the damage the soda would do. Even the citric acid in diet sodas and other drinks can wear down your enamel. I think you can want to enjoy soda while still trying to keep your teeth attached to your head.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            tbh if you’re drinking soda often enough where straws are the reason your teeth don’t fall out, I don’t think the health of your teeth is the biggest concern.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              Yeah, that would be a problem, but It was also hyperbole. It doesn’t take much soda to damage your teeth though.

      • nicktron
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        If you’re drinking enough soda that the way in which you consume it concerns you and your dental health, you have a problem.

    • DessertStorms
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Single use bendy straws were literally invented to help keep bedbound and other disabled people alive. There are also many reasons people can’t use different alternatives.

      You personally not using something, doesn’t mean others don’t, and to deny access to a literal lifeline for the sake of 0.003% of the plastics in the ocean (literally a drop in an ocean) because it makes you feel better and requires zero effort or sacrifice (from you), instead of actually acting to resolve the problem (like being anti-capitalist rather than just trying to apply band aids to its symptoms) is not only gross and ableist, but also a colossal counterproductive waste of time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Shit man you got me, I want disabled people to die from thirst, I fucking love killing disabled people in the weekend it’s my favorite hobby.

        Calling me ableist because I make fun of straws is legitimately deranged, are you in the pockets of big straw or something?

        (also the solution to plastic straws is easy, just use the ones that you can clean and reuse)

      • Overzeetop
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        kinda neat

        Climate debate over folks. “Kinda neat” trumps destroying the environment every day of the week. If they were just “sorta neat” or “not really neat” we could ban them, but putting a few hundre metric tons of plastics into the waste stream is a reasonable tradeoff when you’re at the level of “kinda neat”.

        I kid, of course…kinda.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    592 years ago

    Strongly recommend hay straws (like, made of “straw”).

    They’re better than paper in that they don’t sog up. They’re inconsistent in size but that has never bothered me. A little flimsy, but I stir iced drinks with them all the time.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Do we really need more sugar? We already have too much sugar in our diets. Why make straws into sugar too?

        • brianorca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          They make the straw from parts of the sugar cane plant that don’t contain sugar. (After using the other parts to make sugar.)

          • setVeryLoud(true);
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Correct :)

            It’s basically made of wood pulp.

            I do love people’s knee jerk reaction at the word “sugar”. I don’t think they’ve ever seen a sugar cane, they’re probably imagining this:

        • setVeryLoud(true);
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Sugar cane, silly, not candy cane :)

          It’s wood pulp, there is almost zero sugar in a sugar cane once they’re done extracting the cane sugar out of it, which is when it can be re-used to do other things.

          It’s made of bagasse (sugarcane fibers, basically wood pulp) and binders like PLA and is entirely compostable.

          • Cethin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            I figured it was made from the sugar from sugar cane, but it seems that it is just the cane from the sugar cane. I have seen sugar straws, so my bad.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Holy shit why didn’t anyone think of this before lol

      Well straw can easily split. Don’t know how I feel like spending $5 on grass. 🙄

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        They don’t have any taste even if you chew on them a bit. The box does have a slight shrub odor, but it doesn’t seem to be present when using them.

  • 🇨🅾️🇰🅰️N🇪
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    We have a couple metal straws and washable plastic ones. The metal ones probably have lead and the plastic ones are made of baby kittens.

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    If I’m not mistaken, manufacturing facilities spray PFAS agents on various conveyor parts to prevent pulp from sticking to them and therefore require stoppage and cleaning. In other words, PFAS reduce the time and money spent on cleaning manufacturing equipment. Congratulations shareholders!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      I’m glad someone is thinking of the shareholders. It’s about time we focus on them and not such pesky abstractions like “the environment” or “the future”

      /s

  • _galactose
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    “All the straw manufacturers should take warning and say, ‘Hey, do we use this stuff?’ Because at the moment, they’re not even asking that question,”
    That is kind of concerning!