• @[email protected]B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    572 years ago

    Back in the old days when a software contains these crap, considered as adware/malware and people get their pitchforks.

    Now: its normal.

  • miffmaff
    link
    fedilink
    English
    372 years ago

    So as far as i know, firefox is the only mayor browser not based on chromium. Also, firefox is dependent on google’s funding because of a search engine exclisivity deal. So my understanding is that, if google decides to kill firefox, they could easily do that. Well, what then? Is there any other browser left wich similar features that would be untouchable by google?

    • Mkengine
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      You have to decide for yourself if those browsers have the features you need, but just for your interest, other non-chromium browsers are Ladybird, NetSurf, Flow, Pale Moon, Basilisk and K-Meleon.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        Honestly, I’ll give credit to Apple for pushing forward JXL on webkit and pushing back against Chromium team’s dominance and Mozilla team’s apathetic stance in the browser space. While I appreciate Mozilla’s stance on Manifest V3 and several other issues, I can’t help but hope for more development from the Servo project.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      We will have to maintain a Chromium fork with their trackers removed, if it comes to that.

      Likely Google won’t do anything until or unless the bulk of the public moves off of Chrome over this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        So the lawsuit appears to be looking at Google as a search engine monopoly, not web browser, right? And if I’m understanding this right, assuming this lawsuit goes anywhere, it would actually incentivize Google to pull funding from Firefox to no longer support that search engine exclusivity deal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Google still benefits from having Firefox around, so that they can maintain less of an appearance of a monopoly in the browser space. Whatever way they fund Firefox, it’s still to their benefit to do so.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        This is pretty much the same situation as when Apple faced bankruptcy a while back and Microsoft essentially bailed them out.

        Having an effective monopoly is better than a literal one for legal reasons

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      This should be the top comment, and I’m going to come back to view the replies. I can’t personally think of any realistic alternatives. Someone further down posted a link to an article about the US investigating Google for a search engine monopoly, but I’m not sure how large a role that would factor into web browsers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      242 years ago

      Fun fact, Firefox used to be called… Netscape… Yeah… Let’s see how many miklenials are in here!

      • SokathHisEyesOpen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        And remember what happened when Microsoft tried to kill Netscape? That needs to happen again, but against Google.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 years ago

        Sort of. Netscape released the program’s source code and Firefox used that as a base, but it wasn’t like they took Netscape and just changed the name to Firefox like your comment implies. They were competing browsers for a while.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 years ago

      But there are a few specific hardware configurations and specialized jobs that Linux doesn’t work for, therefore nobody should use it!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Why not be happy both OS options exist? Both have a place and a use and in various ways an ease of use

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          That’s the point. We want options for OSs to exist, instead of one company monopolizing the entire market.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Linux with 100% market share can’t monopolize the entire market because it doesn’t have a centralized distro

            You see similar to Google with Redhat/Canonical. If everyone was with them then it would be a problem

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Linux with 100% marketshare means nothing.

              GPL is designed to protect developer rights, not user rights.

              If google packaged your linux distro and sold it through the play store bundled with their own apps and sandboxed everything and called it chromeOS, your rights would not be any better protected.

              Security and privacy involves users making informed choices to protect themselves, full stop.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Any of thousands of people can say this but i don’t see it in the comments below so: I’ve been using a Linux Mint / Windows dual boot system for over 10 years and love it. I think a lot of people see Linux as highly technical, but versions like Mint and Ubuntu are more carefree than Windows nowadays.

    • facts
      link
      fedilink
      402 years ago

      Riiiight, because Google wasn’t doing sneaky tracking shit leading up to this. This time, they’ll surely switch, all dozens of them, and a couple might even use Firefox. woohoo

      Reality: https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share

      Someone reply to me saying they just switched to make this a perfect internet circlejerk.

        • Ferris
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          something about the way it [chrome] handles memory isolation means i get fewer blue screens at work with all my bloated browser tools loaded at the same time. I have to have ~15 tabs open. It is not my laptop, so I cant go around experimenting with plugins much.

          then again who gives a flying fart if chrome tracks me while i use the same internal browser tools day in and day out?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 years ago

              That was also my experience with Firefox. I tried it one time because I kept hearing it was better than chrome, and then the absolute first thing I noticed is that they can’t get tab dragging right.

              I don’t care how much more “private” it is than chrome. If you can’t even get the first impression on absolute basic UI elements right, I simply have no faith in your browser

              Maybe I’ll use Firefox when it matures a bit

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Mostly for increased privacy but also additional features. Firefox and it’s forks are usually relatively limited in feature set.

          Speed isn’t a problem on any of them for me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          212 years ago

          Orion is not open source so that’s a no. There is no way to know that what they tell us is true. If they free their code it might become my go to browser as well.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            There is a way to tell - just check the binary. Actually, you need to check binaries of open source apps as well.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 years ago

              Check the binary for current outgoing traffic? Sure but instant traffic is not the only way to be tracked, and it is particularly difficult to get an overview for a browser.

              A open source project is automatically safer to use. Sure, any binary can be injected with crap but in a closed source app there is really no way to know anything for sure.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 years ago

                  Sure the binary is what I run, but I am not following what your point is. If you are paranoid about binaries from an open source project, just compile it yourself. It’s easy. That’s just not an argument against open source.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        downvoted for stating facts. I can only give you one updoot brother, you’re the hero we need.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        I used chrome since it was launched and this summer I switched to Firefox on all devices.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        192 years ago

        Sometimes there is a proverbial straw to break a camel’s back.

        I mean, for some percentage of users this will be it. Will it be a significant share of Chrome users? Probably not, but it just means those of us who got people to switch to Firefox in the 00’s and Chrome in the early 10’s need to be as vigorous with getting people off Chrome now.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          But think about it. You’re talking on Lemmy - currently a niche messaging board with a tech focused audience. I don’t think you’d count as the average Chrome user. Most people won’t hear about this or if they do, won’t care.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            ‘Average user’ just means all traits proportionally blended together, right? Lemmy users are not a huge part of the internet, but our contribution to the ‘average’ is just a big as any other person; and our opinions and knowledge and behaviour does matter. Some might argue that the opinions of tech-focused people matter more because they are more likely to influence other people about tech decisions.

            So yeah, we’re a niche group - but the discussion and sharing of ideas is important.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          392 years ago

          I knew about that. They also pay to be the default search engine on Firefox.

          But my joke was that these changes make it seem like they don’t want people to use Chrome anymore and switch to Firefox instead. If users knew about this stuff and understood it, Firefox would bounce back.

          • Ænima
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I have already begun to move from Google services.

            Look for other large corporations to continue this trend: offer a product to the masses for free, wait until you have little to no competitors and dominate in market share, then put it behind a pay wall or strongarm changes that most of the population doesn’t understand. Oracle did it with Java, knowing most companies were too invested to look for alternatives, and now Google is doing it with their Chrome baked-in privacy changes and ad crackdown.

            I expect to see more of this trend from “free” services as the people continue to wake up and take their personal data seriously. We know the government(s) won’t do a thing to change the status quo, and I have no idea what else to do other than cry into my ramen and binge watch the death of a planet in 4K!

            Unfortunately, the rich keep scarcity high to ensure they not only make the most money, but they can use less money to buy favors from those with less. Man greed sucks…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              62 years ago

              It’s even more insidious when you look at the shit Amazon does, im almost certain they hyper-aggressively track the popularity of products not made by them, ones that are made by small companies (and even individuals in some cases) for the sole purpose of seeing what’s popular with the masses and then they make their own shitty version of said product followed by undercutting the original products cost significantly. And when people go to search they of course put their shit product at the top of the search page so that’s the one the unaware will always buy. It’s kind of a genius business model if we are being honest, if you’re an absolute shit stain that completely lacks morals that is. I just can’t believe they’ve been allowed to do this for so long under the radar because I feel like I never hear people talk about that particular scummy tactic they use.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            If users knew about this stuff and understood it, Firefox would bounce back.

            I wish that were true. But how long have companies like Google and Meta been tracking people? Ask anyone on the street if they think Google and Meta know everything about them and they’ll say “yes but I don’t care” or “yes but it’s unavoidable”. There’s just no way people don’t know by now what incredibly invasive corporations they are. They just don’t care.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              I do think they know these companies are invasive, but they don’t fully understand the ramifications of it, nor do they care to.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            While I agree at some level, most users aren’t like you or me. They are my mom, my boss, my mailman. They only care about convenience, and understanding even the difference between browsers is one thing, let alone why they should use a different one. Unfortunately I don’t think that’s likely to change. If it was, Facebook wouldn’t exist, if those people cared about their online privacy they wouldn’t use the platform, but here we are

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              Yeah, people knew enough to ditch IE for Firefox, but I think Google’s marketing convinced everybody that Chrome was the best. Most people tell me they use Chrome because it’s the fastest.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        I made the switch a few weeks ago. While the transition was a little inconvenient, I got everything set up in maybe an hour or two. Performance was wacky for a few hours after that, but it’s settled now for my purposes.

        You definitely have to finagle the browser with add-ons and other about:config things to make it work for you, but after that yeah I can say I prefer Firefox over Chrome!

        Now I just need to deGoogle everything else…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          I actually never stopped using Firefox. I tried Chrome/Chromium on and off since it came out in 2008, but I never understood the appeal. Chrome looks more minimal, but it always ran like crap on Linux and Mac for me. Was it better on Windows or something? The constant memes about Chrome’s RAM and CPU usage would lead me to believe it isn’t.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Unlike the glitzy front-page Google blog post that the redesign got, the big ad platform launch announcement is tucked away on the privacysandbox.com page.

    The blog post says the ad platform is hitting “general availability” today, meaning it has rolled out to most Chrome users.

    This has been a long time coming, with the APIs rolling out about a month ago and a million incremental steps in the beta and dev builds, but now the deed is finally done.

    Users should see a pop-up when they start up Chrome soon, informing them that an “ad privacy” feature has been rolled out to them and enabled.

    That’s actually what started this whole process: Apple dealt a giant blow to Google’s core revenue stream when it blocked third-party cookies in Safari in 2020.

    Google says it will block third-party cookies in the second half of 2024—presumably after it makes sure the “Privacy Sandbox” will allow it to keep its profits up.


    The original article contains 588 words, the summary contains 159 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    862 years ago

    Firefox has been my go-to, but I’ve left Chrome installed just to have on hand incase some website fuckiness could be solved with a browser change.

    Naw. It’s not worthy of staying around even for that. Time to completely scrub my devices of google.

    • HidingCat
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Nah, I use Edge for that. Chrome is only for work for me, but I think I’m going to migrate to another Chromium-based browser for that.

    • ghostatnoon
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      I’ve been doing similar; been using Firefox, but Chrome is installed for its browser-wide automatic captioning. Not something I need often, but I rely on it for the occasional remote meeting here and there. I’m sure free automatic captioning applications exist for my operating system, but I’d have to actually test each one to see if they actually work, and it’s just been so convenient keeping Google’s around.

      (Speaking of which, if anybody happens to have recommendations for free automatic captioning software that works on Ubuntu, I seem to be in the market…)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      382 years ago

      Feeling the same, it’s surprising how many companies are just leaning towards screwing users for a few more pennies on the dollar. Eventually, Google with be the next AOL.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I suggest to use chromium as the backup “in case a webpage doesn’t work on Firefox” browser. All the compatibility but no telemetry.

      • eric
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        But why use chromium or any chromium based browser since google disabled ad blocking plug-ins?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          152 years ago

          I suggest it as the backup browser. Use Firefox and if you need to open something that only works on chrome, I’d rather use chromium, so Google doesn’t rape your computer when trying to use the internet.

        • HidingCat
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          Eh, did they? I’m sure I still have Ublock Origin on the work browser, which is Chrome.

          • igorlogius
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            just fyi, when Mv3 (at least googles version of it) will completely replace Mv2 … uBO or for that matter any content/ad-blocker might not be able to perform as well on chrome based browsers.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    I use brave which is a chromium browser with all the tracking stuff turned off and a few ad blockers baked in. It also has some vpn and crypto wallet stuff built in but it’s not in your face so you can just ignore it.

    This ad platform shouldn’t affect brave right? Should just be another thing the brave team are able to automatically switch off when the browser updates?

    • Kilgore Trout
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Firefox is the only web browser you should be using. Firefox.

      Brave, Edge, Opera, only contribute to the Google monopoly, even though you are not using directly Chrome.

      • Melpomene
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        I use Firefox, but given the fact that Chrome and its variants control so much of the browser space and Firefox so little… I wonder how long until Firefox has until it is rendered useless.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          As ironic as this sounds, Google can’t let Firefox die because then it would become a monopoly

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Firefox is too small for them to care, the only browser with a larger share is Safari (Webkit).

        • Pons_Aelius
          link
          fedilink
          212 years ago

          I wonder how long until Firefox has until it is rendered useless.

          I have been hearing about FFs imminent demise for about 20 years now…

          • Melpomene
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            It will likely never die entirely, but it’s what… less 10% of its peak market share back in 2010?

                • Pons_Aelius
                  link
                  fedilink
                  32 years ago

                  No, it isn’t.

                  I have been hearing this shit for 20 years.

                  Google pays mozilla to keep it alive so they can side step anti-trust laws.

                  I hate to break it to you but google already dominate the web.

                  FF is not going anywhere.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    You can just disable it when it pops up. I hope it continues to warn new users when first setting it up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Yes, it seems to be trendy to use this as a reason to switch to Firefox, but surely you can just totally disable this new feature in Chrome? The article even tells you how to do this. I guess people are switching as a protest?

      • Kilgore Trout
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        It’s a new feature in the testing phase. Once it’s proven to work correctly (for Google), the option to disable it will be taken away.

          • Kilgore Trout
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            It’s how Google rolls out new features all the time.

            First they ask you. Then it will become a opt-out flag. Then maintaining the switch option will be too much work and it will disappear.

            Honestly what should concern you is that this is the way Chrome is going, not that you are allowed to enjoy it your own way for a little while more.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    nuked that shit from my machine.

    only going to use it inside a VM now for testing purposes

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    I should have never left Firefox when chrome came out. Its good to be back. Especially before any of this happened.

  • dinckel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 years ago

    Now that Firefox is getting in-page translation capability, Chrome does not offer any features I am missing anymore. As long as they don’t start performance wars, like the shit that happened with Youtube a while ago, I’ll be fine

    • ゴン太
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      Wait really? Is it on the stable version or do I need to install beta/nightly?

        • ゴン太
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Thanks, didn’t realize it’s an add-on. Much better because now I can use it on Librewolf. :D

            • ゴン太
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Offline translation, nice. I’m gonna miss Opera GX stylish theme but I’m ready to ditch Chromium-based browser again, at least on desktop :D

              Edit: I’be checked the add-on, unfortunately my mother language and other popular languages are not supported yet.

        • tiredofsametab
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          That’s fantastic if the quality is good. I only use chrome now for pages purely in Japanese that I need to deal with and can’t properly read in full yet (which, living in Japan, is a fair few, heh). EDIT: Bah, no Japanese support. Oh well; some day.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    Is this just for chrome,or is it on all chromium browsers? Im running bromite,but considering going back to Firefox.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      642 years ago

      But donating your money can not make firefox independent.It will only make firefox more revenue.

      Google wants to keep mozilla afloat to stay out of anti-competitive allegations.

      • Madis
        link
        fedilink
        English
        242 years ago

        And the money won’t go to Firefox, but Mozilla’s other projects.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        If mozilla gets market share, google will defund them. That mozilla have a money will help.

        Also mozilla’s other projects are also good ;)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Some of Mozilla’s other projects are good, iirc there was a journalist a few years ago who chronicled how Mozilla had donated a lot of money to other charities unrelated to it’s goal rather than reinvesting in the business so that it can try to ween off of Google reliance.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          132 years ago

          Also big CEO wallets.
          Nothing in comparison to others but there is some special pay going.

          But it’s definitely the lesser of the evils.

  • circuitfarmer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1852 years ago

    Please, everyone, stop using Chrome. This is an easy vote with your wallet that doesn’t even require your wallet.

    Complacency means the internet gets worse, ads get worse, nickel and diming gets worse. It’s the easiest chance to take a stand you’ll ever have.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I use it at work because of it has the best dev tools. Although edge is pretty much the same so I could use that, but not much of an ethical upgrade.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          I use it at work because of it has the best dev tools.

          Every Chromium fork has those same tools.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I know that. I acknowledged that in the next sentence when I talked about edge.

            But it still wouldn’t stop me from using chrome because I need to test with it. It’s what most of our end users use. I’m not about to install Vivaldi or something when we don’t even support it, and none of our users use it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Serious question: let’s say I continue using Chrome and Privacy Sandbox becomes the norm. How does my internet experience get worse?

      • circuitfarmer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        One key change in the short term is the Topics API. This is the replacement for 3rd-party cookies in Privacy Sandbox. Basically, it allows sites to query your browser directly about what topics you enjoy, and Chrome will respond with topics based on analysis of your browsing history to allow for targeted ads. If it seems strange that a new “privacy” feature is still serving up data about you for targeted ads – it is. And in fact, a lot of the proposed changes potentially just give Google more sway to act as a middleman, which ultimately gives them more data.

        Will your experience change immediately? Likely not, but as with many things in this space, it’s about the dangers of the path and its longer term implications, specifically here about corporate controls and softening the definition of “privacy”.

        Here’s a decent overview with more far more details.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          I know what the Topics API does. I’m asking for a concrete example of exactly how it’s going to make my internet experience worse. (That Register article doesn’t provide one.)

          • circuitfarmer
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Losing privacy makes your internet experience worse. That seems pretty clear to me, but if you don’t care about corporations being better suited to target ads to you, then I don’t think anyone would be able to convince you that these changes are bad.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              I’d love to debate this with you properly but I’ve got COVID right now and don’t have the energy to put together a decent response, sorry. Basically I just don’t see how the specific features in the new Chrome build let advertisers do anything they can’t already do. I don’t see how they contribute to ads getting worse, or where “nickel and diming” comes into it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    I already use Firefox for everything that’s not literally for my D&D stuff. Because some relevant fan sites don’t display properly on Firefox for some stupid reason. That’s it. So even if they manage to get past my blockers, they literally are telling me nothing I will ever care about because I already have/know where to get any relevant thing those ads might be shilling, and the rest is all irrelevant noise.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Same, though those D&D websites work in Brave with the usual blockers turned on (uBlock + Brave’s blockers), so maybe its an engine thing?