Openscale for weight

bundling matrix and email would be cool

It says

Codeberg is a non-profit, community-led effort that provides Git hosting and other services for free and open source projects.

Codeberg?

Why now and not 10 sears ago?

What does it do?

Why?

I installed it based on your recommendation and it is full with macropayments.

You might be interested in reproducible-builds.org or f-droid.org/en/docs/Reproducible_Builds

I tried using it but it’s not the same vibrant community anymore. Zed is much more alife

Thx! I’ve got zsh and ohmyzsh installed but my workflow hasn’t changed really. Also, I really want to store and see a command history.

Back when I used traditional distros I hated that I had no history of user installed packages/apps

Now I could just write a file and append all installs. With atomic distros, it’s clearer nowadays, but I can also save packages for later

At least an ai would’ve adressed the topic but the post didnt

That’s smart, thx

Unfortunately, the article does not write about how people use it.

I use it to skip reading docs. Either it works, or I read the docs, sometimes in parallel, whatever is faster.

Oftentimes I just forgot how some function is called.

I’m still in the testing phase and in more than 50% of the cases its crap. Halizination is a real problem with those models that I’ve used.

Difficult. Paperwm/ Niri has the best workflow.

I am looking forward to set niri as compositor on cosmic.

I think it’s astonishing that the media believes someone accidentally invites a journalist into a highly classified group.

Visibility :/

I am no dev of rust.

My guess:

• they didn’t want to scare anyone.
• They really think that MIT is free and that anyone shall do with it whatever they like. They are not afraid that someone takes the rust code base and produces a proprietary fork and make money from it.

You are allowed to license your code change under gpl, you do not have to use MIT just because the package author uses MIT. You can use GPL.

You can also use MIT or no license at all. it does not force you to use MIT

You could say that, yes.

It makes sense to suggest MIT license for a MIT project

MIT is better than proprietary. MIT does not force you to not make your project free.

It’s kind of the default in the docs

https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/manifest.html?highlight=License#the-license-and-license-file-fields

SPDX license expressions support AND and OR operators to combine multiple licenses.1

  [package]
   # ...
  license = "MIT OR Apache-2.0"

Using OR indicates the user may choose either license. Using AND indicates the user must comply with both licenses simultaneously. The WITH operator indicates a license with a special exception. Some examples:

MIT OR Apache-2.0
LGPL-2.1-only AND MIT AND BSD-2-Clause
GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Bison-exception-2.2

When I started out (I don’t write Rust but other languages), in my first years, I liked gpl and after a couple of years I got to know MIT and I started using that because I thought it is “more free”. I wasn’t aware of the consequences immediately. Once I read the GNU philosophy and started reading more about free software, I started using gplv3 again