Crazy marketing and release strategy for this one, making it just vague enough to inspire drama between those-who-believe and those-who-didn’t; from what I can tell, it has generated A LOT of interest, and the Steam numbers are super high right now. We might see more of these slow-leak-surprise-drop releases going forward, based on the success of this.

fake and gay

fake. hoax. and if not: stupid. UE brown-gray filter is the same color and consistency as the fecal matter of a dying elderly person, all fluffy and gray and sandy-like, like shitting saw dust, you know? if this is real, it’s embarrassing. they missed the whole aesthetic idea of the original game (Tolkien-esque, very colorful, but dark disturbing somewhat eldritch underbelly), which begs the question: what else did they miss?

love these "explain why"s that are literally always “because we are trying to make as much money as possible.” didn’t need an article to tell me that.

When criticism of the act gets enough likes on Lemmy and/or Reddit—that’s when I know what to think.

oh damn, why am i just now hearing about this

no shit

nice, what did you think of it?

Tolkien’s descriptions of settings and flow w/ action sequences really make the book fly by. although, i thought the ending was a bit rushed—with the death of Smaug being somewhat disappointing, and the little war at the end was more of a whimper than a bang.

otherwise, brilliant little book, it felt like going on a DnD campaign or something—and rightly so, considering it sort of inspired all that.

I don’t particularly like or care very much about RFK, but… uh, I didn’t hear him say anything about “sending people to farms/camps/etc.” I would be concerned about the literacy and/or comprehension skills of OP and the commenters insisting this to be the case if I didn’t already know it’s just partisan hackery.

This comic would have been just as effective–and less insulting–had they not included the explanation at the top; the graphic gets the point across just fine.

i saw this post and wondered to myself, “why all the down votes?” and, despite hating the reddit voting system in its entirety (imo, the number one source of conformity, dullness, and unnecessary-obsession in our online world; the whole thing really should be burned down with prejudice), i thought to myself, “the down votes are probably because this person seems to be more interested in building an audience than the art of writing.”

but then! lo, i checked your profile and quickly realized that you’re either a gamergate refugee with an inoperable 4chan-brain tumor, or you’re a really bad troll (and i hate just dismissing people as “trolls” because it’s too easy, but this is a special case); your sole work is a poorly supported anti-feminist critique of a female anime character posted in the feminism community (lol), with an opening line that is just oh so obvious bait: “As someone who believes in traditional gender roles and views women’s primary value in their appearance and domestic skills.” which then goes on to just make blanket statements with no real conviction or supporting arguments. it’s one thing to argue for traditional gender roles, it’s another thing entirely to post stuff like: “Maomao, the protagonist, is portrayed as highly intelligent and skilled in medicine, a field traditionally dominated by men. This challenges the notion that women should focus on homemaking and child-rearing instead of pursuing intellectual or professional careers.” like, OK, it does challenge the notion that women should focus on homemaking and child-rearing etc. but you fail to explain how this is a negative thing, which means either A) you’re incapable of forming a coherent argument for your own beliefs, or B) you’re trolling.

so, in conclusion: you are receiving so many down votes because you’re either a troll or a bigot (or both).