doublepepperoni [none/use name] to [email protected]English • 7 months agoNintendo's suing Palworld (for real this time)www.nintendo.co.jpexternal-linkmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up190cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up190external-linkNintendo's suing Palworld (for real this time)www.nintendo.co.jpdoublepepperoni [none/use name] to [email protected]English • 7 months agomessage-square41fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareKoboldKomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish38•7 months agoJoke lawsuit. The only valid response is a to any lawyer or judge who decides to waste time arbitrating whether or not a soulless husk can own a concept.
minus-squaregay_king_prince_charles [she/her, he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-27 months ago“We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram.” is the correct response from palworld here
Joke lawsuit. The only valid response is a
to any lawyer or judge who decides to waste time arbitrating whether or not a soulless husk can own a concept.
“We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram.” is the correct response from palworld here