Joke lawsuit. The only valid response is a
to any lawyer or judge who decides to waste time arbitrating whether or not a soulless husk can own a concept.“We refer you to the reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram.” is the correct response from palworld here
When Palworld came out, I was surprised that the ever-litigious Nintendo didn’t take some sort of legal action. So to all the people on here who thought that was a bad take and called me out, all I have to say now is: you’re lovely and I appreciate you
Nintendo being shitty? Just another Thursday. What’s more it’s a SOFTWARE PATENT lawsuit, which means that it’s the one kind of lawsuit that’s even more fucked than a sketchy ass copyright lawsuit would be. Nintendo wants to make it so that nobody else can make a game with fun creatures that you catch, collect, ride around, etc.
Nintendo is the Disney of bideo bames, is up to the same kind of skullduggery, and has a similar toxic fandom that’ll go to the mat for them.
lol nice.
Fuck Nintendo, but this is funny to me because it’s just another cash grab early access game by a pop up game studio. they are about to spend all their profits on litigation and then abandon the game just like the rest of their projects.
Watching pokemon knock-offs build assault rifles in a sweat shop in a trailer for this game was one of the most edgelord things I’ve ever fucking seen. Cringy ass game, cringy ass devs. Fuck them and fuck Nintendo, too.
“You don’t have to do edgelord shit featured in the game’s promotional materials, but if you don’t, you’re just playing knock-off Pokemon with that edgelord shit in the background.”
100% agree. The game looked like dog ass from the get-go. My disdain for it only grew as all the rubes who spent $30 bucks on it tried to defend it and tell me it’s good. I knew it wasn’t and I know the hype would fade within a week.
There was a meme where people would kidnap the police and force them to work in the mines. That was pretty good though
If Pocketpair were American, I honestly think they might have a chance. But from what I’ve heard, Tokyo District Courts aren’t likely to rule against Nintendo.
I’m sorry but uh, for what? The concept of collectible battle monsters?
Nintendo about to start suing plumbing companies for stealing the concept of Mario
In another thread someone linked Nintendo’s patent on mounting a creature and being able to both fly through the air and run along the ground while riding said creature.
We don’t know what Nintendo is suing about yet, and it’s possible they have something real like they found out that the devs ripped an asset from a pokemon game and tweaked it with AI like a lot of people were speculating at one point, but right now I’m leaning towards this lawsuit is fucked and if Nintendo gets away with it they will be stifling every game with collectable creatures in the industry.
That does not sound like a real patent. Or at least something that should not be a real patent
To be fair I saw one “Pal” that just straight up used Zoruas model.
Nintendo never cared about stuff like Digimon or Cassette Beasts, so I’m guessing the problem is actual models made by Nintendo were used. Buuuuut this is Nintendo and they sent people cease and desists over Pokemon fan games FFS, so who the hell knows.
I mean, Palwords developers are skeezy, but on the other hand so is Nintendo, also fuck copyright.
Since it’s a patent lawsuit they’re going after game mechanics rather than character designs, but we don’t know which mechanics yet
Look again. There were no model rips.
Digimon
i get that they’re commonly seen as rivals outside of japan (because saban localised the anime w/ the very intention of challenging pokemon, instead of leveraging the obvious differences), but like, if nintendo had gone after digimon, they’d be going after literally anything featuring monsters. the original 1997 iteration of digital monster was “tamagotchi for boys,” which is where battling & evolution comes in
obv the similar names might seem awfully sus, but as i understand, the abbreviating of names like that is fairly common in japan. like, if we knew the franchises as pocket monster & digital monster, there would still be a similarity there, but it would seem less egregious ig.
thank u for suffering my autism
They would have had a hell of a time bringing down these juggernauts
We should make this a Digimon fan site. Sick of the PokePosuers on here.
Call it LTV-Pets.ru
There is a small but dedicated cluster of Digidestined
masaru says “punch gods, no masters”
Kicking myself for not making my account “ComradeWizardmon”.
There is a some digiposting in the mega
Honestly Nintendo has had some big wins lately getting people to fold rather than fight in court even when the fight should be winnable. Maybe they’re just hoping that happens here too. Get these guys all tied up in court even if Nintendo knows they won’t win just to keep the Palworld devs occupied with the court fight rather than making their game
deleted by creator
They didn’t specify which patents were being infringed upon. It’ll be interesting to see how this goes. It’s in Japan so I assume Nintendo’s got this in the bag
According to a Mastodon post, the speculation is it’s over “patents such as one for throwing and using Poké Balls in a 3D space (JP,2023-092953,A); and one for automatically switching between ride Pokémon as a player transitions between different terrain, such as between air and the ground (JP,2023-092954,A)."
IANAL, certainly not in Japanese patent law, but the first one sounds stronger to me, but still not bulletproof.
Patents are so fucking stupid loo
God patents for game mechanics are so fucking stupid and should be thrown out entirely
the idea of patents were sold to us with this romantic tale of the lone inventor being able to live off his genius.
none of that is real. patents are absurd and should be abolished, just like copyright (sold to us with a similar fairytale).
The fundamental flaw with patents is being transferrable and the property model of them. Within the context of the current political economy, it would make more sense if someone used another’s patent commercially, the patent holder just gets a tax credit equal to some small percentage of the sales. And sweet Jesus the entire concept of being able to buy and sell patent rights is fucked up.🔝
AFAIK game mechanics in the US can’t be patented, especially board games. It’s one of the few things American copyright law isn’t fucking stupid about.
Oh boy I hope you never read about Konami and DDR patents/lawsuits
deleted by creator
Which would work out in Pocketpair’s favor; establishing that it was an existing, common mechanic before the patent was filed will typically get it nullified.
Yeah World of Warcraft’s been doing that since 2004?
Nintendo assassinates the pope
Was Palworld ever anything other than “latest fad”?
It was one more Steam early access survival crafting game, though it made quite a big splash due to the novelty of having pokey men in it
Having played palworld it is a significantly diffrent product. I don’t see specifics in thr article but it is unclear to me what the actual claim could be
Nintendo is being evil again I’m so shocked
