Nope, not me… I’m still trying.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Not true… every thought had to have been thought for a first time by someone, just not by us (it seems).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        it includes absolutely nothing that’s already familiar to you

        I truly do not believe that any thought exists without context, if you can find any examples I would be happy to be proven wrong.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            Sure, but by your definition any thought containing any kind of language would not be “original” because it requires familiarity with the language.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              Now you’re breaking off into something else that fascinates me… symbolism as a highly efficient method of communication. If you test yourself, you’ll find it takes less time for your brain to process symbols than spoken words… and there’s a very short amount of time in there where your brain understands what it’s looking at without the need of any other language other than symbolism.