You did it again! The point you’re intentionally missing is that giving any shitty ideology an impressionable audience isn’t better because you agree with the ideology. Clearly you think serial killer story hour would be a negative influence, but if that serial killer was in a dress and prostitute makeup you would be perfectly fine with it.
You can just do a google image search for prostitute makeup and get 200000 examples to the point where you almost certainly are being intentionally obtuse.
People wear make up for different reasons and have different approaches to wearing it. For all I know you think anyone wearing red lipstick makes them a whore. I don’t draw conclusions about what people do with their genitals based on that they put on their faces. I was just trying to figure out how you were coming to your conclusions.
It sounds like you have a psychotically antisocial mental disorder. You are convoluting the discussion unnecessarily and entirely without rational thought.
I don’t know what else to tell you. Multiple people have pointed out flaws in your logic and your response each time is " lol you’re wrong I’m right" and that kinda is exactly what you accused me of. But whatever, it doesn’t matter. You’re just some random on the internet trying to get into arguments, or maybe you actually believe the shit you’re shoveling, either way it doesn’t matter.
Okay, let me clarify for your psychotically delusional amd logic-deficient excuse for a ‘mind’:
1- Serial killing isnt an ideology.
2- Drag shows arent an ideology.
3- Nobody is openly identifying as a serial killer out of pride.
4-Men dressing non-traditionally is not threatening behavior in any way to anyone.
5- Serial killers and drag queens are not philosophical equals.
6-Comparing them to each other in relation to a literary exercise is what closet pedophiles do.
Also, fun fact: drag queen isnt an ideology. Children simply are more engaged with wild and colorful aesthetics than they would be with you buncha fucking droll-ass, bible-thumping prudes
All that has to happen is someone has to say “yes, I understand that it is weird that gay dudes in dresses demand access to and influence over children, but I still choose to give them that access and influence.” Please, fuck up your stupid children however you would like. Send them to Boy Scouts to get molested or put them in organized sports to get hazed and abused. Just don’t lie about what happens.
Wow, that is an EXTREMELY psychotic and paranoid delusional fantasy you’ve been cucked into believing. Not surprising since you do not have the capacity to differentiate between a serial killer and a drag queen, or the likelyhood of one being promoted instead of the other.
NOBODY HAS DEMANDED ACCESS TO CHILDREN. The only people who make that claim are pedophiles, so you’re going on the list like all the other pedophiles caught projecting nonstop.
READERS: NOTE THAT WE HAVE A POTENTIAL PEDOPHILE IN OUR MIDST, NAMED “PENIX”. Tracks, doesnt it?
Ah, ran out of arguments I see. The starting point is “let’s allow people to read to kids.” The next question is whether “people” here should include men In a dress. If you answer no, it’s on you to explain why it should not.
You are not being objective here and your bias has poisoned every single point you’re trying to make. Know what? Don’t try again. Go yell into a garbage can instead.
Its more fun to watch you run around in circles screaming at the screen. Also, you dont know what objective means, because serial killers are objectively not comparable to men in a costume.
You put Drag Queens in the same list as terrorists and serial killers, dude. I’d say they interpreted it just how you intended.
You did it again! The point you’re intentionally missing is that giving any shitty ideology an impressionable audience isn’t better because you agree with the ideology. Clearly you think serial killer story hour would be a negative influence, but if that serial killer was in a dress and prostitute makeup you would be perfectly fine with it.
What’s prostitute makeup?
You can just do a google image search for prostitute makeup and get 200000 examples to the point where you almost certainly are being intentionally obtuse.
I mean, sure I could Google it. I was asking you because I was wondering what you meant by it.
You seriously don’t know how to recognize when a male or female is tarted up like a hoo-ah?
People wear make up for different reasons and have different approaches to wearing it. For all I know you think anyone wearing red lipstick makes them a whore. I don’t draw conclusions about what people do with their genitals based on that they put on their faces. I was just trying to figure out how you were coming to your conclusions.
Fuck off, bro. This is wildly simple and you’re convoluting it unnecessarily.
It sounds like you have a psychotically antisocial mental disorder. You are convoluting the discussion unnecessarily and entirely without rational thought.
Also you will never get laid.
If it’s so simple, why are you struggling to answer?
Imma need to to read your post again slowly and then explain clearly how you think that is a valid and logical point.
It’s pretty straightforward. You are just certain you are correct so no amount of logic or reason will have any effect on you. 😉
My dude, you just described yourself.
good one, bro.
deleted by creator
Yep.
I don’t know what else to tell you. Multiple people have pointed out flaws in your logic and your response each time is " lol you’re wrong I’m right" and that kinda is exactly what you accused me of. But whatever, it doesn’t matter. You’re just some random on the internet trying to get into arguments, or maybe you actually believe the shit you’re shoveling, either way it doesn’t matter.
It looks like you have started from the assumption that you are right and are working backwards cherry picking what fits. Would you like to try again?
The echidna has a prehensile penis with four heads that is one fifth the length of it’s body.
No it isn’t. It isn’t straightforward at all. That’s exactly why I asked.
Try again.
Okay, let me clarify for your psychotically delusional amd logic-deficient excuse for a ‘mind’: 1- Serial killing isnt an ideology. 2- Drag shows arent an ideology. 3- Nobody is openly identifying as a serial killer out of pride. 4-Men dressing non-traditionally is not threatening behavior in any way to anyone. 5- Serial killers and drag queens are not philosophical equals. 6-Comparing them to each other in relation to a literary exercise is what closet pedophiles do.
Also, fun fact: drag queen isnt an ideology. Children simply are more engaged with wild and colorful aesthetics than they would be with you buncha fucking droll-ass, bible-thumping prudes
Ooh bro, that’s a miss. You have to start asking yourself “if it doesn’t matter, then why does it matter so much?” 😉
No I dont. If it doesnt matter, what does it matter so much TO YOU?
And who the fuck are you to be telling everyone else how to live their fucking lives?
All that has to happen is someone has to say “yes, I understand that it is weird that gay dudes in dresses demand access to and influence over children, but I still choose to give them that access and influence.” Please, fuck up your stupid children however you would like. Send them to Boy Scouts to get molested or put them in organized sports to get hazed and abused. Just don’t lie about what happens.
Wow, that is an EXTREMELY psychotic and paranoid delusional fantasy you’ve been cucked into believing. Not surprising since you do not have the capacity to differentiate between a serial killer and a drag queen, or the likelyhood of one being promoted instead of the other. NOBODY HAS DEMANDED ACCESS TO CHILDREN. The only people who make that claim are pedophiles, so you’re going on the list like all the other pedophiles caught projecting nonstop. READERS: NOTE THAT WE HAVE A POTENTIAL PEDOPHILE IN OUR MIDST, NAMED “PENIX”. Tracks, doesnt it?
Oops, you’re wrong again and clearly can’t see why. Try again bro.
Ah, ran out of arguments I see. The starting point is “let’s allow people to read to kids.” The next question is whether “people” here should include men In a dress. If you answer no, it’s on you to explain why it should not.
You are not being objective here and your bias has poisoned every single point you’re trying to make. Know what? Don’t try again. Go yell into a garbage can instead.
Its more fun to watch you run around in circles screaming at the screen. Also, you dont know what objective means, because serial killers are objectively not comparable to men in a costume.