• Llituro [he/him, they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    362 years ago

    Goddamn, at this point I’m starting to wonder what problems even fucking are normally distributed in some sense. It’s the same as guns and car pollution, fuck. Beef is expensive as hell these days anyway.

    • ChapoKrautHaus [none/use name]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      at this point I’m starting to wonder what problems even fucking are normally distributed in some sense

      Well, things that are somewhat equally distributed. Can’t have a normal distribution in a society where things are distributed unequally. (wanted to do the rollsafe meme here but couldn’t find it)

  • GnastyGnuts [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    For me dairy is the hard one – meat fucking sucks now, especially for how expensive it is. Like the actual quality of meat seems to have gone down dramatically since like 2017-ish.

    • Tony! Toni! Toné! ☑️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      Almond milk and never look back. I’ve been almond milk exclusive for almost a decade and now I can’t stomach the smell of dairy milk.

        • Mardoniush [she/her]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 years ago

          Yeah, oat and pea milk don’t have the environmental issues almond milk has. A quick look at almond production in the US west made me way less enthusisatic.

            • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              If I were in charge, I’d get rid of every dairy first. Producing cow milk is significantly more water intensive than producing almond milk. So this argument (almond milk bad because almonds take a shitload of water) leads inexorably to an even better argument to avoid cow milk: cow milk bad because cow milk takes even more water to produce than almond milk does.

              If you’re going to avoid drinking almond milk because of its water consumption, you had better be avoiding cow milk as well, for the same reason.

              • Completely true yes, but the transfer would take a hell of a lot of time. Years or decades. Especially if almond milk cant replace milk in all its functions. The industries will continue until the other production method expands enough to facilitate the previous jobs and similar or increased output.

                Speaking of which can I get some sources for that claim, i haven’t read anything on that specifically. I do know almond farming is quite draining of resources for low returns.

                I don’t avoid anything for personal consumption, almond milk is more expensive than regular milk here because hawaii has everything mass imported. Also can you bake with almond milk, or soy?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            92 years ago

            Yeah it’s still better than dairy though right? I actually really dislike almond milk, I’m not even sure how people like it I hate it so much. I do really like oat milk, soya milk is my favourite though and it’s a crime that it’s underappreciated lol. The one I buy has the same protein and calcium content as dairy with 2.1% fat, and it has 0g of sugar unlike dairy that has what like 5g per 100ml? It also has much less saturated fat of course. And it’s only £0.50 (~$0.60usd) at Aldi

            • Mardoniush [she/her]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              In terms of health, sure. In terms of environmental footprint, quite possibly worse though iirc US agriculture and pasture makes even Australia look water conservative, and we grow rice in the desert

              • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                92 years ago

                In terms of environmental footprint, quite possibly worse though

                This is not true. There are dairies in California, quite a lot of them, and they take much more water than almond farms. So I agree, almonds shouldn’t be grown in a desert and in a better world they wouldn’t be, but saying that almond milk is as bad for the environment as cow milk is extremely wrong, and worse, gives carnists reason to keep drinking cow milk.

  • if we put these people to a vegan diet and everyone else cut out their meat by a good 50% we can probably fix a lot of issues from ecology to diet, then we can move on to pressing matters

  • Ho_Chi_Chungus [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    442 years ago

    This is actually a statistical error. Beef Georg, who lives in a cave in Colorado and eats 60,000 cows a day, is an outlier and should not be counted

  • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    642 years ago

    That is wild. I’ve cut back on meat consumption to only once or twice a week and advocate to people who want to try vegetarian/veganism but struggle with it to just approach it gradually rather than all or nothing. I make the argument that if we all reduced our consumption by 50-80% that would go a lot further than only a few people reducing their consumption 100%.

    Now I’m not so sure. Maybe we just need to put these 12% freaks in a gulag and feed them nothing but beans for a few years.

  • i had not thought about it, but this does not surprise me. the ideology of the US is to make the wealthiest asshole in a room of 10 people feel completely free to ruin everyone else’s experience/lives.

    i remember when i was much younger and first recognizing the environmental destruction of overconsumption and the shittiness of rich people stunting on poor people, and not for anything so noble as “feeding kids”. rather, “i’m gonna buy a hummer and drive across country” or “i’m buying a fashion accessory for $2500.” i would impulsively say, “that’s stupid. you’re an asshole” to those people.

    and, right on cue, other americans would swarm me and say, from the script, “it’s their money. they have every right to spend it how they want.” for 9 out of 10 of us in the US, that thinking is still dumb, but probably not undermining community or the biosphere. but there’s the 1 asshole that sees their personal power in the moment as an invitation to wreck the place. to piss all over the sink in a restaurant. to break the public phone or steal the phonebook. to take all the candy in the bowl. to not wash their hands after a shit.

    there’s one person in a room of 10 that needs a constant reminder that their actions have consequences and if they are an asshole, the other 9 are within their power to smack some sense into them.

    • Mardoniush [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      “I have free choice, so that means every available choice is morally corrrect” is possibly a founding brainworm of American capitalism.

    • Hot take: I think the liberal abhorence of physical violence in schools in self defense of bullies. I don’t think there’s a good way around it or we should just let it get back to the “good ol’ days”, but kids who defend themselves often get the book thrown at them. I worked in schools years ago, and most of the time admin would suspend the kid who defended themselves with a wink and a nod to the kid to let them know they actually did the right thing by punching the bully in the nose. I saw a white rich girl get a black eye from the black girl she was being overtly racist to (even calling her the n word), and staff all felt it was justified. But there’s a small contingent of administrative staff on school boards that will expedite expelling kids for these situations, which I also saw happen.

      Idk, I just feel like if you’re hurting people, people can and will kick your ass, and that’s actually a valuable lesson.

    • star_wraith [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      other americans would swarm me and say, from the script, “it’s their money. they have every right to spend it how they want.”

      It’s almost painful to me how accurately this describes most Americans.

  • muddi [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    The stat that horrifies me is how a person can consume multiple lives in one sitting. Like every two chicken wings equals one life slaughtered, and people get orders of 8 pieces at once, maybe multiple times a day or for multiple people.

    I guess cows, pigs, horses, whatever are bigger animals and feed more people, but it’s still messed up to me to know that one small meat snack requires the slaughter of an entire animal. It’s not like we can amputate their legs and only eat that part.

    I think I’d still feel the same knowing the cost of lives of other products. Like how many lives had to be lost to mine the cobalt in each of my electronic devices

        • disownthelibs [none/use name]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          The wings have joints. Wings aren’t usually served whole. It’s like an arm. They have the part that’s from the shoulder to elbow, then elbow to wrist, and there’s a third joint that’s like the hand but it’s too small to do anything with so it’s usually cut off and not served or just fried with the lower part of the wing because it’s mostly cartilage.

          • ilyenkov [she/her, they/them]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            Do they take part of it off before selling whole chickens? Every chicken I’ve seen in a grocery store just has the one on each side

        • Ho_Chi_Chungus [she/her]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 years ago

          Birds have 2 whole wings, but in many cases (not all) when served, they’re broken into 3 pieces with the tips discarded, giving you 4 “party wings” per bird