• ElChapoDeChapo [he/him, comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Hot take: game is fun, not great but it’s early acess so it could get better

    Honestly feels more like the Pokémon anime than the games in many ways but in a good way, little things like letting out my fire pal as a light source while mining at night feels better than anything gamefreak has done in the last 20 years

    • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Honestly feels more like the Pokémon anime than the games in many ways

      Honestly, this is why I think all the complaints about it being edgy and stuff are overblown.
      As easy as it is to call Palworld “pokemon with guns”, it’s really just pokemon. JUST pokemon. It’s Pokemon as a 3d openworld adventure game, instead of abstracting through turn orders and menus. It’s pokemon where you can do all the things implied or outright stated in the official games. It’s not pokemon with guns, it’s pokemon that lets you use the guns.
      If they do it well they could end up making the best pokemon game in terms of immersion, they’ve just stopped saying that being the main character makes what you do inherently good.

  • Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    From the library in Diamond/Pearl/Platinum

    A young man, callow and foolish in innocence, came to own a sword. With it, he smote Pokémon, which gave sustenance, with carefree abandon. Those not taken as food, he discarded, with no afterthought. The following year, no Pokémon appeared. Larders grew bare. The young man, seeking the missing Pokémon, journeyed afar. Long did he search. And far and wide, too, until one he did find. Asked he, “Why do you hide?” To which the Pokémon replied… “If you bear your sword to bring harm upon us, with claws and fangs, we will exact a toll.” “From your kind we will take our toll, for it must be done.” “Done it must be to guard ourselves and for it, I apologize.” To the skies, the young man shouted his dismay. “In having found the sword, I have lost so much.” “Gorged with power, I grew blind to Pokémon being alive.” “I will never fall savage again. This sword I denounce and forsake.” “I plead for forgiveness, for I was but a fool.” So saying, the young man hurled the sword to the ground, snapping it. Seeing this, the Pokémon disappeared to a place beyond seeing…

    Long ago, when Sinnoh had just been made, Pokémon and humans led separate lives. That is not to say they did not help each other. No, indeed they did. They supplied each other with goods, and supported each other. A Pokémon proposed to the others to always be ready to help humans. It asked that Pokémon be ready to appear before humans always. Thus, to this day, Pokémon appear to us if we venture into tall grass.

    I’ve always interpreted that Pokemon choose to show up and challenge humans when they want to join them, and will flee/not show up if they don’t want to be with people. Pokemon are clearly stronger than humans and will straight up not listen to you if you don’t have enough badges.

    Also, battles don’t seem to be "real fighting’ in the way that they get injured or anything. Real sickness and injury, death, etc are presented as something completely different from status effects and fainting.

    Okay, thats my incredibly nerdy take.

    Anyway, I’m not so offended by Palwords “animal exploitation” joke as much as it makes me roll my eyes in a “Mario is high on mushrooms lololol Mario is possessing people with cappy lolol” way. It an old and easy joke. I feel like entertainment is nihilistic enough as it is.

    I think a better idea would be a game where the Pals are being exploited by the bad guys and you free them and lead them in a bloody revolution for freedom lol.

  • EdelethIsBae [she/her, she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    also the whole debate over this shit is basically a veiled form of the vegan struggle session so lets just stop pretending we’re concerned for the rights of pixels in the shape of an orange dragon

    chill out, people want to have fake monsters fight each other

  • Acute_Engles [he/him, any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    I’m sure the godly and legendary creatures I keep in a capsule in a bank are feeling good about it. Oh you’re the god of space? Enjoy the luxury ball it’s the only thing you’ll ever see again

  • KittyBobo [he/him, comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    That always bugged me with the Pokémon defense. “Oh, but they like that im the master and tell them to do things. We’re all friends, just a big family!” Is the exact argument you would use if you were subjugating others but didn’t want to feel bad about it.

    • LeylaLove [she/her, love/loves]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      As a massive Pokemon fan, Pokemon’s lore is just straight unhinged. They even say Pokemon used to live as equals to humans, and some would even have romantic involvement with humans. And GF expect me to believe that they want to be in the ball?

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          We co-evolved with dogs over the course of 40,000 years. in so far as the temr “natural” means anything, it is natural for dogs and humans to live together in close cooperation. there’s a theory going that humans and dogs (and domesticated agricultural plants) co-domesticated each other and that our close relationship with dogs (and wheat) is why humans seem to share many traits found in domesticated animals but not wild animals.

          • GinAndJuche [comrade/them]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Malazan plays with this idea by claiming giant fantasy dogs that work for the god of death protected early humans and we kinda evolved as a result. or something like that, its been years.

      • EdelethIsBae [she/her, she/her]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        that would be a completely ridiculous struggle session to have, no one is against banning pets, unless you’re a bastard landlord or have justifiable reasons due to allergies (but even then its usually ‘keep them out of this area’ not ‘ban people from having animal friends’)

        so hexbear will stay free of such things

            • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              But pets are still absolutely subjugated. They are literally owned by humans, are not free and have no agency over their own lives.

              The point is that everyone here going “huh this is just what they said about slaves” are completely ignoring that we have pets, which we love a lot (at least i know i love my dog very much) but they are nevertheless subjugated and treated as lesser. Our dog is not allowed on the couch. Sure, I don’t make my dog fight other dogs, but I am still denying her her freedom and she is my legal property. She would not survive in the wild and she loves me a lot as well, but is that not what they said about slaves? Either way, she is not given the choice. What are the ethics of this relationship?

              Pokemon is a nonsensical setting that can’t decide whether its creatures are more like animals or whether they are sapient, but I think comparing Pokemon to pets is much more appropriate than comparing them to human servants like the house elves from Harry Potter.

              Either way, you do not have to hand it to Palworld, it’s obnoxious, Happy Tree Friends-esque edgelord shit.

              Edit: To clarify: I’m not saying “Keeping pets is ethically good and therefore Pokemon is ethically good”. I think you could argue both, the point is that we shouldn’t pretend like we treat all living things as equal and that, if you assume subjugation to be mistreatment, it is still very evidently possible to sincerely love something you’re subjugating and treating as lesser. Morality and emotions are complicated and don’t make sense a lot of the time.

            • Great_Leader_Is_Dead [none/use name]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              but again most people don’t do that

              Billions of people across the world use animals for labor, before the Industrial Revolution most people did. In much of the underdeveloped world you often have to use animal labor to survive. And often people who exploit animal labor feel genuine affection for the animals, plenty of people who use dogs for more utilitarian means still love them, plenty of farmers care for the donkey that hauls their produce to market.

  • Zezzy [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    SMT negotiations are by far my favorite monster-collecting methods. Just equal parts philosophy, flirtation, and gibberish as they vibe check you.

  • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Pokemon is cockfighting, Mario massacres Goombas and turns by the hundreds in any given game and we know from Paper Mario they’re fully sentient and about equal to human intelligence, the star fox team are a PMC, Samus has blown up 3 planets, maybe more ans wiped out 2 species, sorta 3 if you count Evil Beak or whatever from Dread, he was likely the last Chozo. None of this shit really makes any sense and it’s pretty senseless to go thst deep into it. Especially if you’re being serious.

  • NephewAlphaBravo [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    back in my day we just made a 3 panel sprite webcomic about johto’s labor laws, not a whole shit game with I’m assuming nfts two years after anyone cares about those

    • RION [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      No NFTs afaik and first impressions are surprisingly positive from what I see online. Apparently there’s a lot of factorio-lite automation gameplay???

    • iridaniotter [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Unfortunately, it seems that pokemon society is not vegan so it’s also canon that people just eat pokemon.

      It’s way funnier than that. The Pokémon company has anthropomorphized Pokémon so much that they feel icky about killing them. But they also have chronic carnism brain. The result? They’ve recently designed a Pokémon with a limb that falls off so humans can harvest their meat without feeling bad. There’s a scene in one of the shows where a character straight up drinks Shuckle juice from its orifices. Actually, that carnist design goes back a couple decades. People will literally come up with the most ridiculous explanations in their FANTASY world instead of just making it vegan.

    • NephewAlphaBravo [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      One game’s villain has a pokemon that uses a maximum-damage Frustration. Friendship’s default value isn’t zero, meaning gamefreak has gone out of their way to say “this guy canonically abuses his pokemon”

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      In that game the frustration move is bc the badguys did some evil techno-magic to the mons that makes them angry and aggressive, and if you treat the shadow pokemon well it will “open their hearts” and they’ll lose the frustration move. It exists bc the bad guys hurt the pokemon’s feelings to weaponize their alienation.

      And making them spirits isn’t any better. Kami aren’t any less individuals with feelings than animals or pocket monsters.