I was curious what the Linux people think about Microsoft and any bad practices that most people should know about already?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I don’t think about Microsoft at all mostly. I supported their stuff professionally in the past and friends/family but otherwise total avoidance. They own some big game studios so I probably use some of their products like Minecraft but I haven’t used their operating systems or applications for decades and I dislike and distrust cloud services and theirs is no exception. All big companies tend to be the same. Try not to depend on any of them.

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    3911 months ago

    my favorite bit was how no one at microsoft actually understood their own licensing pricing. for decades, you could call microsoft for pricing and get different answer from people in cubicles next to each other or even from your own rep.

    it was as if they were making it up as needed.

    • Hellmo_luciferrari
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      Microsoft just like many other big tech companies are shoehorning AI into everything. It’s a new fad, and if it isn’t a fad, this is how idiocracy starts IRL.

  • Sonotsugipaa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8411 months ago

    Microsoft is definitely the corpoest of them all.

    Probably not the worst corpo, likely even, but out of the corpos, they are the most corpo corpo of any corpo.

    1. They own LinkedIn, and I could just stop this list here.
    2. They’re the founding fathers of Embrace, Extend and Extinguish.
    3. They are the vanguard of videogame studio consolidation, after buying Activision and Bethesda.
    4. AI
    5. Everything they do is soggy bread: you can eat it, it’s probably mostly healthy, I think, but if a product is not the minimum viable product then it will be; take the Halo franchise as a reference for blandness, Windows for end user tolerance - both are controversial yet functional and popular software that people complain (and do nothing) about. Halo took quite a hit in popularity, but still…
    6. Remember when a software company got in trouble for monopolistic practices? That was a thing that happened at some point, and it was Microsoft. Not that it will ever happen again, nowadays all the cool kids have some slice of the tech landscape on a chokehold.
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1111 months ago

      Ok but look on the bright side of things! you get great futures with this big tech concentration and control of the market. For instance, who else doesn’t want a operating system hotkey to Linkedin, baked into their settings? How did I use a computer without that before?!

      • Sonotsugipaa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’m not sure, at least the unrepairable mess made by Microsoft is software rather than hardware - you can reinstall a janky OS but you can’t unexplode a phone that disassembled itself when you sneezed in its general direction.

        There’s no fine line between the two companies.

        Edit: they continuously fucked up Halo in unexcusable ways, fuck them, they’re worse than Apple. Forgot about that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        811 months ago

        Apple is highly restrictive on their OS and over priced. They are extremely pro consumerism with heavy marketing and engineered obsolescence to ensure you are always pressured to buy their new tech, and they are historically very strongly anti-right-to-repair.

        Microsoft is bad. But at least they are primarily a software monopoly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      Yes. Microsoft is the king of “good enough” software. DOS was good enough (and had a free C compiler!). Windows gets the job done 95% of the time when it’s not freezing up or needing rebooting. Office is okay - and nothing else is 100% compatible so you get a bonus of vendor lock-in. New features are few and far between, as are bug fixes for non-critical issues.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      711 months ago

      They took down the fucking don’t be evil sign! Google used to be a good company but I don’t trust their actions. I’ve only found out about the spyware level chrome browser, not to mention that Google has been coloring my searches on the internet.

      But what do I expect from a ADVERTISING company first and for most?

      Don’t authenticate to a search engine.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Impossible to know it, there isn’t any other corporation who fight with M$, it is a perfect monopoly so it’s impossible to figure out a world without it.

    My point could be: you can’t compare the actual reality to a hypothetical reality because the hypothetical reality isn’t real. So how can you know it exactly?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    411 months ago

    One pet peeve of mine is how in Windows 10 switching between virtual desktops was flawless, and somehow in Windows 11 they fucked it up. At first it had no animation when switching, the taskbar kind of glitches. Now it has an animation but it’s kind of delayed and the taskbar still kind of glitches, it seems to reload or something. Kinda crazy honestly

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      Maybe it’s just the hardware I’ve tried to use it on but it always seemed to take too long for me in 10, too (haven’t used 11). Whether trackpad gesture or win+tab, it’s just always seemed sluggish compared to other options.

    • xep
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      Could it be the new taskbar? It’s the worst part of W11, I don’t understand why they had to replace the old one.

  • Captain Beyond
    link
    fedilink
    2111 months ago

    Microsoft is about as bad as any other proprietary software company. They do some good things for the open source economy, but they also mistreat their users.

    I think it’s a mistake to look at the free software movement as being a reaction against Microsoft or Google. It’s against the proprietary software world in general.

  • Kawawete
    link
    fedilink
    311 months ago

    I consider their new push for webapps in stead of traditional client as bad practice, its buggier and runs like absolute shit

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    311 months ago

    I personally have no problem with people using Windows but I don’t want it shoved down my throat. When people first boot their computer they should have the option to choose what OS to install (Windows, various Linux distros, and FreeBSD) and that choice should always be available in the bios.

  • UnfortunateShort
    link
    fedilink
    12
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I think overall they are not better or worse than other tech giants. They try to be the platform for blank and thus to push competitors out of the marked, or lock it down so they can’t enter. They try to extract as much money from their customers as they can, even if it makes the user experience worse. They push the boundaries of what the can legally do. They charge you, but you don’t own anything.

    What really grinds my gears is how they try to force stuff on me that I don’t fucking want. I feel like they are completely different in that regard than for example Google. I use Google Maps because I want to. I don’t use Chrome because I don’t want to. It’s that easy. They don’t ask me to reconsider, they don’t make it super complicated to switch, nothing. I can disable any Google App and forget about it.

    To stick with the Google comparison, I also feel like Google informs me better and gives me more control regarding my data. This feels much more hidden on convoluted in MS products in general. For example I had no idea Office is basically spyware before reading about it elsewhere. In Google-land, they seem much more upfront about what they use and what I can opt out from (or in to).