Pricefield | Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 2 years ago

When your city implements confusing cycling infrastructure

lemmy.ml

message-square
54
fedilink
826

When your city implements confusing cycling infrastructure

lemmy.ml

@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 2 years ago
message-square
54
fedilink

Source: https://twitter.com/urban__bird/status/1678222512637767681

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22•2 years ago

    Yeah Canadians are at least polite. In Germany, they will just silently remove the bike lane and sent police ON BIKES herding cyclists from sidewalk into the traffic.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10•2 years ago
    • Mogan Freeman voice* The city did not figure it out after a cyclist was killed.
  • Rob Bos
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28•2 years ago

    Oh dang I bike that on the regular. It sucks!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      30•2 years ago

      You read the sign, someone’s gotta take one for the team

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17•2 years ago

      Godspeed brother

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21•2 years ago

    Is there a picture of the actual junction?

    • @b3nsn0wA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66•
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      this seems to be the spot (with the same car, lol)

      edit: i think i found the problem too. look at it from this angle, the bike lane just disappears. like wtf?

      WHO DESIGNED THIS?

      • ansik
        link
        fedilink
        20•
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        This is obviously still designed as shit but I believe this is the intent!
        https://media.cleanshot.cloud/media/67165/209GFODiC4HzKYjOwOxg0kN6inGVQml1ZPjqyfCe.jpeg?Expires=1689187732&Signature=JjDMqNJpws0OXaCYFlMS8szfm8lBMsJjZRCMvvgDll1JbT1Dl0X2SI7-jfX6OuxdPSBRZhANQszAO9AgG7NPycd0-qUgyr5U4Sla6ej0SuioD9N8w1SCkWjgQy-G926WkJHLZsg5y4pxcEPwqZBhjKNI-rBm6112DZicFkqC0GZj7Qm-f76oVKccbbJzStTqktcP-IIBDAex-4WOQUh-9o~DenId5VMA812NguGc1s1Lz092dsDp5fAXI8oFSE-TuGt48TpRNEdV68XtQ9rKoOOSJSj4dPzu41DfspjMPF3ohmeHyD7QnDJPQBSJNFj9evFox2lX~sHq9KDo7kgCOA__&Key-Pair-Id=K269JMAT9ZF4GZ

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4•2 years ago

          Yes, because bicycles sharing the lane with cars for random stretches works so well. No one’s life is in danger here! /s

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2•
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Cars can’t actually drive down this road anymore. The only vehicle traffic allowed through this area is busses turning around and taking their breaks at the end of the line.

            I guess you can technically access parts of this road through the alley way but there are definitely bollards up at the Broadway end and the other end is right turn only for busses. This area is not high vehicle traffic

        • @b3nsn0wA
          link
          fedilink
          18•2 years ago

          there is no bike lane on that side of the road though

          (also, you can embed images with the ![alt text](https://image_url) syntax

          • ansik
            link
            fedilink
            4•2 years ago

            Do you go both ways on bike lanes? In Sweden I’d often go in the car lane but never against the flow of traffic

            Thats how I embedded it, does it appear weird for you? I’m on kbin if that might be the problem

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3•
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              It looks like a regular hyperlink, you need to tap it to see the picture. For embedded pictures you leave the alt text blank. Also no you stay on the same direction as cars. The problem is this bike crossing doesn’t lead anywhere, there is no bike lane coming this direction. And you should typically ride to the right of cars but it might be ok to be on the other curb when it’s a one-way street like this.

              • ansik
                link
                fedilink
                3•
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Thanks! I moved the alt-text, hope it works now!
                The bike crossing leads to a bike lane going eastbound on E Broadway, it comes from a one way street with no bike-lane. It’s on the wrong side since it’s only for bikers turning left, bikers turning right will continue on the right shoulder of the lane.

                Still dumb but the only real problem I have with it is that bikes are expected to cross 6 lanes of traffic going who knows how fast with no stop light.

                Edit: added a few lines to the sketch in my earlier comment to better show what I’m meaning, maybe

                • Rob Bos
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1•
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  The part that makes me feel least safe is the brief shared space with cars going between two bike lanes. To continue along the greenway from Victoria, you need to cross and do a ~50m stretch along Broadway, cars bearing down behind you. And the right turn off is not obvious - I missed it the first time I went. It’s not at all clear where the path continues.

                  edit: fine, I suppose the un-controlled six-lane crossing is also pretty bad…

              • glibg10b
                link
                fedilink
                4•2 years ago

                For embedded pictures you leave the alt text blank

                That’s not necessary. I usually leave it in so visually impaired people know what the image is about

            • @b3nsn0wA
              link
              fedilink
              6•2 years ago

              you forgot the exclamation mark from the front of your image embed. the syntax is kinda confusing, [this is a link](image_url), ![this is an image](image_url)

              also, i’m no expert in bike lanes, but it seems to me that the original idea here was that the bikes would go onto the wide sidewalk over here, but that doesn’t seem to be very well-communicated. where i live (budapest) we have some sidewalk-bike lane combos, but they’re marked, and when they’re not, pedestrians have a priority and sidewalks can be frustrating for cyclists.

              • ansik
                link
                fedilink
                2•2 years ago

                There is an exclamation mark in front of the image embed :S
                https://media.cleanshot.cloud/media/67165/AusvK5nCamhjX93x3MKTlmGmrheExg8Nl6RJNsCc.jpeg?Expires=1689189710&Signature=OiYmPQv1u2R7dbSX82euZDckK0N~j4LSbrBeASKaJk33RGmP83nGvUumdC9NGTDtdCaedtIZFmC3cvJjonXQ0Xh0Qlg5HVFbGQeDHA6Dp-PxsIFy2fYZcs~sL-MMRJaJm1UgU1p2MALDeUoReIEJwC9X0SHMZkX5jcrNAA0rTKrAkWaE9FzjSLEEwBIjAt6EnrGwXksiJYOGxUIvPmTZa8sJbOBxPZAPVWCNSRi~5XRZqB8zqrpx8b-kjdkBskbzi2FThmWPrknCeuThGMoPii~yPMOo9VAs-MHQeS0k-08KIIx~rXMOO8tyRqPCCATyQJL6sW5swwsGf3Vx-8GUgg__&Key-Pair-Id=K269JMAT9ZF4GZ

                • @b3nsn0wA
                  link
                  fedilink
                  4•2 years ago

                  weird, it looks like it works perfectly when i click through the fediverse link to your instance, but the exclamation mark is lost on my end. sorry, you were completely right from the beginning, kbin and lemmy just don’t know how to talk to each other

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          2•2 years ago

          The only arrow on there that looks intentful is the vertical blue arrow. Everything else is just regular stroad, and their threshold for a bicycle “”“way”" being unsafe is apparently when it starts perpendicularly crossing four lanes of traffic at once. And even then it only deserves a partial coat of paint ending in a 90° turn into a bicycle gutter.

          That’s not “designed”, that’d be an insult to road design&engineering. That’s a council member who took an exasperated sigh, angrily drew a straight line on a google earth printout, and said “now stop bothering me with this fucking cycling nonsense, I am already late for my kids’ soccer match”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    86•2 years ago

    Love how professionally this was made. Not just a printout but an actual sign.

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13•2 years ago

      Fastened with 14 bolts, nonetheless.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5•2 years ago

        And washers!!

  • Whey Isolate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8•2 years ago

    Damn I literally just passed this street a few minutes ago, pretty jarring to see familiar places like this on the internet

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1•
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It looks like the eastern road has a bike lane, and western road does not. Are bikes allowed to go both directions (one against traffic) in a bike lane? I guess I need more information on how this works. Here’s how my brain interprets it.

    https://pub.xhci.com/bike-lane.png

    From the top-view, the eastern bike lane seems kind of unintuitive, but it’s clearly marked from the street: https://pub.xhci.com/bike-lane-streetview.png

    From another post, the lat/lon appears to be here: 49.262344, -123.066766

  • queermunist she/her
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47•2 years ago

    My favorite is when they put the bike lane in the middle of the street between the right and left vehicle traffic lanes. I feel so safe with murder machines on both sides of me!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8•
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      D.C. has this with four lanes on each side and near highway speeds and people with domestic immunity zipping around through traffic. It’s nuts!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -37•
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • MatthewToad43
        link
        fedilink
        13•
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        @marmo7ade @queermunist Who is “they” here? Cyclists?

        Plenty of cars don’t stop for stop signs and traffic lights too. At least around all the crossings near where I live. Now, it’s possible that there are timing issues, but AFAICS the mentality is it’s okay to keep going as long as the car in front of me is moving. Regardless of the state of the lights.

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15•
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’ve been hit by a car a lost several weeks to amnesia from a TBI, forgive me for being afraid of murder machines when I have nothing but a painted line to protect me from them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26•2 years ago

        Made come back to reddit (ew!) to get this saved comment


        Nah.

        Car drivers break the law slightly more than cyclists, with a far greater toll.

        This separate study came to the same conclusion:

        Cyclists Break Far Fewer Road Rules Than Motorists, Finds New Video Study

        And this study:

        Cyclists Are More Law-Abiding Than Drivers

        Also car drivers cause the vast majority of accidents between bikes and cars.

        Four in every five crashes between cars and bicycles caused by driver of car

        This seperate study in Melbourne came to the same conclusion:

        https://www.bikeradar.com/news/drivers-at-fault-in-majority-of-cycling-accidents/

        In 88.9% of cases, the cyclist had been travelling in a safe/legal manner prior to the collision/near miss. Most happened at or near a junction (70.3%) and most were caused by sudden lane changes by the motorist, with sideswipe the most frequent cause (40.7%).

        And this one carried out on behalf of the Department of Transport in London:

        https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2009/dec/15/cycling-bike-accidents-study

        With adult cyclists, police found the driver solely responsible in about 60%-75% of all cases, and riders solely at fault 17%-25% of the time.

        And this study by The City of Westminster Council:

        https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/crashes-involving-bikes-mostly-drivers-fault-9s2ssx06vn9

        The City of Westminster Council found that drivers were to blame for 68 per cent of collisions between cyclists and motor vehicles in the borough in the past 12 months. It found that cyclists were at fault for only 20 per cent. In the remaining 12 per cent of cases, no cause could be found or both parties were to blame.

        And one from Bavaria, Germany. In 2013-2016,

        In car-bike collisions, the car was at fault 75% of the time In semi-bike collisions, the semi was at fault 80% of the time

        So that’s five separate studies in different cities and countries, using different methodologies, all coming to the same conclusion.

        Cheers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1•2 years ago

          Damn, I wish I could save this on lemmy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1•2 years ago

            Pretty sure you can. Im using Jerboa and can bookmark comments and posts.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2•2 years ago

              Nice, unfortunately not in memmy on ios

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1•2 years ago

            You can? There’s a save button under the comment

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8•2 years ago

          hardly surprising, there’s much less incentive to break road rules when you’re completely vulnerable to everyone around you and balanced on 2 wheels.

Fuck [email protected]

[email protected]
Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

  • to raise awareness around the dangers, inefficiencies and injustice that can come from car dependence.
  • to allow a place to discuss and promote more healthy transport methods and ways of living.

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn’t choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don’t use slurs. You can laugh at someone’s fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don’t post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn’t a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

  • 1 user / day
  • 10 users / week
  • 103 users / month
  • 560 users / 6 months
  • 3 subscribers
  • 761 Posts
  • 13K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • @[email protected]
  • UI: 0.18.4
  • BE: 0.18.2
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org