

Other nations preempted USA invoking it.
Other nations preempted USA invoking it.
Other nations preempted USA invoking it.
A planned attack is still an attack.
It absolutely isn’t.
They can’t use article 5 preemptively
USA did after 9/11.
USA has had travel advisories for years. You guys can’t figure out how to not shoot people.
Who’s to say the CEO did that?
I’m sure you can see the reason I’m asking these leading questions by now. Extrajudicial killing is bad no matter which side it is. Have a good day and don’t kill anyone.
If they have Plex pass then it’s still fine.
You can use this for any example of self defense though. If we accept that the CEO represented an imminent threat to Luigi and to others,
Who accepts this though? Who determined this?
See my problem with this argument, is if you’re all so determined for Luigi to have a fair trial to defend the position of self defence, shouldn’t that CEO have had a fair trial rather than be extra judicially killed too?
So you agree killing is bad?
Fuck the opinions around here are unhinged.
Why did you want that person killed?
Everyone who has power by grid has all the hard infrastructure in-place for fiber to their home.
That’s absolutely false.
I think you all massively underestimate how much is required to run fibre out to everyone. It’s not impossible, but USA is a very big country by area.
I’ve seen about 250mbps down on a friend’s terminal. You can probably get faster.
Not everywhere that has power has fibre though.
(PS Green Mario did nothing wrong)
He killed a guy. So he did.
Has to be one of the worst rides.
If you didn’t vote then you were fine with this outcome. The majority are ok with Trump winning.
Are you me? I’ve been doing the exact same thing this week. How creepy.
Why? It’s not even a question of if it was him. And it’s not even a question of whether he killed the guy.
He is a murderer whether you agree with why he did it or not.