The world is not black and white. Comments such as yours just waste time.

Spread kindness and it will grow

You are right. You don’t have to teach. You can just be angry that people are “being transphobic” and not engage in the conversation.

Hey, that’s clever. Snails are a scourge of gardening. “I want to kill those suckers.”

It makes sense that they made doodles of their desirrd victory over the garden-munching snails.

I’m noticing a lot of insults and accusations of transphobia, but it’s not there.

Teach people the skills needed. I wouldn’t want to learn or hang out with someone who snubs a person that says something wrong.

If you weren’t taught, you won’t know.

No teacher treats students the way I am seeing.

It isn’t like the data will be displayed to the world. The dude is just talking about science having data points.

It is a person seeing that the child was born XY, write that down, and… not even the name is needed. The point of data, a (+1), let’s science know there is now +1XY.

The data doesn’t affect the person in any way.

If a person born with XY chromosomes is more likely to get a disease, goes through the healing process of transformation, and then gets the disease… it would be nice to know for statiatics that it was an XY-born person. A beautiful woman, but born XY. If she gets the disease, it is false to say the disease affected an XX-person.

This is not transphobic.

I would guess because people such as yourself insult and don’t teach. I’m grouchy tonight.

Rude. Are you proud of your insult? How does that help the conversation? If a human doesn’t understand something, it is because they were never taught. You had an opportunity to educate someone about something you know. You had a chance to spread knowledge. You chose to insult them.

Top teams won’t even consider a woman. I recall years ago applying for top guilds in World of Warcraft. I logged onto TeamSpeak for the interview, said hello, and was immediately rejected because “women are too emotional to work with”.

A woman might be the best player in the world, but the sport doesn’t respect women and will deny her a platform .

Wanting to ensure the fidelity of data is not transphobic. You can be trans, that’s fine. For data purposes, what were you born as? Male? Thanks. You’re a woman now? Ok cool.

What is transphobic here?

You’re being rude. All the guy is saying is that it might affect data.

Does that make them a transphobe to say that male genetics has a higher chance for colon cancer and having it be tracked as a woman would dilute/fog up the data?

Science and data are objective. This guy just cares about numbers, not your sex and gender. Just the numbers of it.

The way you’re presenting is haughty. Rather than find something to be offended by with the comment, find something productive to add to the conversation.

Tried =/= improved, but tried > didn’t try.

And realize that tried and failed is not Biden’s fault. He didn’t block and push against all the legislation.

Sherman said, however, that police tend to rely on immunity, which historically has shielded them from liability when they avoid taking an action such as placing a person in custody.

Immunity is a crime.

Thanks! I was in the middle of framing them and got distracted . I’m glad I did 🥰

Anything that has four corners is like magic

Oh I missed that great opportunity :3 Very nice

Oh that explains it not always being the same. But why 11 and 6? That’s the leap year thing? And that 12? That one is still weird.

“We deeply regret what happened and we sympathize with the family and everyone affected by the sad event. We reinforce our commitment to act with diligence and responsibility.”

what does that even mean? Reinforce our commitment to act with diligence and responsibility

What diligence and responsibility did they show when they didn’t delete the posts? The entire response from @choquei is a passive write-off.

The article via Google translate:

The Minister of Human Rights and Citizenship, Silvio Almeida, cited the case of suicide of a young woman who was the target of fake news to defend the accountability of both those who spread false content and the companies responsible for social networks. “The regulation of social networks becomes a civilizing imperative”, he stated this Saturday (23).

Minas Gerais student Jéssica Canedo, 22, appeared in false conversations with comedian Whindersson Nunes, publicized by gossip profiles on social networks, which reported that the two had a relationship.

Before she died, Jéssica published a text stating that, because of fake news, she was suffering attacks on the internet. Her family reported that she already suffered from depression.

“Tragedies like this involve mental health issues, without a doubt, but also, and perhaps to a greater extent, issues of a political nature”, wrote Silvio Almeida on his profile on X (formerly Twitter).

“The irresponsibility of the companies that govern social networks in the face of content that other irresponsible and even criminals (some involved in institutional politics) propagate on it has destroyed families and made a minimally healthy social life impossible”, continued the minister.

 "Therefore, I return to the point: the regulation of social networks becomes a civilizing imperative, without which there is no talk of democracy or even dignity. The rest is a bet on chaos, death and the monetization of suffering" , he concluded.

Also on X, the Minister of Women, Cida Gonçalves, said that the student’s death is “the result of the irresponsibility of profiles on social networks that profit from misogyny and the dissemination of lies and, equally, the lack of accountability on the platforms”.

 "It is unacceptable that the lying content against Jéssica, which led to a defamation campaign against the young woman, was not taken down by either the owner of the page or platform X for almost a week, even after appeals from Jéssica herself and his mother", declared Cida.

Bill

Silvio Almeida also republished on

“Changing the liability regime for digital platforms is a political and even moral imperative that Congress must face. PL 2630 YES!”, says the message.

“The responsibilities [in Jéssica’s case] need to be determined and the authors identified and punished. It’s not a left or right debate, it’s about civilization! The big issue needs to be resolved: platforms are not neutral, algorithms they reward the extreme, the grotesque, the destructive, the aberrant, the chaotic. And this is paid for! There are people profiting from the degeneration of society”, wrote the parliamentarian.

Understand the case

 At the beginning of the week, gossip profiles shared fake screenshots of a conversation between Jéssica and Whindersson.
 The fake messages involved supposed flirting on Instagram, culminating in a request for a personal meeting.
 Both, however, denied the authenticity of the messages, claiming they were fake news, and stated that they did not know each other.
 The student then published a long message on her Instagram account, revealing that she was suffering attacks. She explicitly asked for the deletion of posts containing fake screenshots.
 One of those responsible for the Choquei profile, who wrote about the case, even made a joke about Enem's writing, in response to Jéssica's publication, and then deleted it.
 Family members reported the student’s death; Whindersson and Choquei's legal advisors spoke (see notes below).

Read the note published by the Choquei profile:

"We deeply regret what happened and we sympathize with the family and everyone affected by the sad event. We reinforce our commitment to act with diligence and responsibility.

The profile Choquei (@choquei), through its legal advice, would like to clarify to its followers and friends that there was no irregularity in the dissemination of the information provided by this profile. It should be clarified that there is no responsibility to be attributed for the acts carried out, given the action in good faith and regular compliance with the proposed activities.

In relation to the events circulating on social media and which were associated with a tragic event involving the young Jéssica Vitória Canedo, we want to emphasize that all publications were made based on data available at the time and in strict compliance with the usual activities arising from the exercise of right to information.

This profile’s commitment has always been and will be to legality, responsibility and ethics in the dissemination of information within the limits established in the Federal Constitution, especially in art. 5th, item IX.

Finally, we reaffirm our respect for intimacy, privacy, well-being and integrity.

São Paulo-SP, December 23, 2023.